head to head · open source
Jitsi vs teamtype
Jitsi has 29,935 GitHub stars, 8,028 forks, 141 open issues and last shipped today. teamtype has 1,920 stars, 54 forks, 113 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Jitsi leads on adoption by 1,459% (29,935 vs 1,920 stars). Jitsi is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; teamtype is written in Rust under AGPL-3.0. Jitsi has attracted 27% as many forks as stars, teamtype 3%. Jitsi was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Jitsi | teamtype | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 30K | ★ 1.9K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-17 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.0K | ⑂ 54 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Jitsi if
- You weight community size — 30K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick teamtype if
- You want the teamtype feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and teamtype fits your workflow better
About Jitsi
Jitsi Meet is an open source video conferencing platform built on WebRTC standards, designed for privacy focused, account free video calls. It operates as a standalone web application or embeddable component, supporting both browser based and native mobile usage without requiring user accounts to join meetings. The project lives in the video communication ecosystem, competing directly with proprietary services like Zoom, Google Meet, and Slack’s built in calling.
read the full Jitsi overview →
About teamtype
Multiplayer mode for your text editor! For complete end user documentation see the [Teamtype Documentation][docs] site. [!NOTE] Until October 2025, this project was known as "Ethersync". The motivation for the rename was explained in this PR. Teamtype enables real time peer to peer collaborative editing of local files using your own text editor or other tools. For example, you can use it for pair programming sessions, brainstorming, or note taking. It's the missing real time complement to Git and other version control systems! Features 👥 Edit files concurrently by multiple users using different text editors 📍 S…
read the full teamtype overview →
More in Business Software
Related comparisons
More Collaboration & Communication projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Collaboration & Communication field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Jitsi or teamtype more popular?
Jitsi has 29,935 GitHub stars and teamtype has 1,920. Jitsi has the larger community by that measure.
Are Jitsi and teamtype free?
Both are open source. Jitsi is licensed under Apache-2.0 and teamtype under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Jitsi and teamtype?
Jitsi is written in TypeScript and teamtype in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Jitsi or teamtype?
Choose Jitsi if you want the larger community (29,935 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose teamtype if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.