head to head · open source

Jitsi vs sharkord

Jitsi has 29,931 GitHub stars, 8,026 forks, 141 open issues and last shipped yesterday. sharkord has 1,496 stars, 134 forks, 52 open issues and last shipped 7 days ago. Jitsi leads on adoption by 1,901% (29,931 vs 1,496 stars). Jitsi is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; sharkord is written in TypeScript under MIT. Jitsi has attracted 27% as many forks as stars, sharkord 9%. Jitsi was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (webrtc), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Jitsi ★ 30K sharkord ★ 1.5K category Business Software

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Jitsi sharkord
GitHub stars ★ 30K ★ 1.5K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-11
Forks ⑂ 8.0K ⑂ 134
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Jitsi if

  • You weight community size — 30K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Jitsi profile →

pick sharkord if

  • You want the sharkord feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and sharkord fits your workflow better

full sharkord profile →

About Jitsi

Jitsi Meet is an open source video conferencing platform built on WebRTC standards, designed for privacy focused, account free video calls. It operates as a standalone web application or embeddable component, supporting both browser based and native mobile usage without requiring user accounts to join meetings. The project lives in the video communication ecosystem, competing directly with proprietary services like Zoom, Google Meet, and Slack’s built in calling.

read the full Jitsi overview →

About sharkord

Sharkord is a lightweight, self hosted, open source chat server written in TypeScript under the MIT license. It provides voice, video, text, and screen sharing for small groups that want privacy, simplicity, and full control over their data. The project lives in the Discord like collaboration and communication ecosystem, and its topics emphasize realtime messaging, privacy, data ownership, and self hosting.

read the full sharkord overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 43K

Related comparisons

plane vs jitsi plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip plane vs anki twenty vs anki odoo vs anki cal-com vs anki plane vs tutor twenty vs tutor odoo vs tutor cal-com vs tutor plane vs hrms plane vs ever-gauzy twenty vs hrms twenty vs ever-gauzy odoo vs hrms odoo vs ever-gauzy plane vs horilla twenty vs horilla

More Collaboration & Communication projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Collaboration & Communication field.

Jitsi vs Plane Jitsi vs Rocket.Chat Jitsi vs cobalt Jitsi vs Buzz Jitsi vs srs Jitsi vs Huly Jitsi vs Zulip Jitsi vs etherpad Jitsi vs drawnix Jitsi vs univer Jitsi vs chat Jitsi vs bigbluebutton

Frequently asked questions

Is Jitsi or sharkord more popular?

Jitsi has 29,931 GitHub stars and sharkord has 1,496. Jitsi has the larger community by that measure.

Are Jitsi and sharkord free?

Both are open source. Jitsi is licensed under Apache-2.0 and sharkord under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Jitsi and sharkord?

Jitsi is written in TypeScript and sharkord in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Jitsi or sharkord?

Choose Jitsi if you want the larger community (29,931 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose sharkord if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.