head to head · open source

Jitsi vs partykit

Jitsi has 29,931 GitHub stars, 8,026 forks, 141 open issues and last shipped yesterday. partykit has 5,710 stars, 200 forks, 93 open issues and last shipped 8 months ago. Jitsi leads on adoption by 424% (29,931 vs 5,710 stars). Jitsi is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; partykit is written in TypeScript under MIT. Jitsi has attracted 27% as many forks as stars, partykit 4%. Jitsi was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Jitsi ★ 30K partykit ★ 5.7K category Business Software

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Jitsi partykit
GitHub stars ★ 30K ★ 5.7K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-01-29
Forks ⑂ 8.0K ⑂ 200
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Jitsi if

  • You weight community size — 30K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Jitsi profile →

pick partykit if

  • You want the partykit feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and partykit fits your workflow better

full partykit profile →

About Jitsi

Jitsi Meet is an open source video conferencing platform built on WebRTC standards, designed for privacy focused, account free video calls. It operates as a standalone web application or embeddable component, supporting both browser based and native mobile usage without requiring user accounts to join meetings. The project lives in the video communication ecosystem, competing directly with proprietary services like Zoom, Google Meet, and Slack’s built in calling.

read the full Jitsi overview →

About partykit

PartyKit is an open source, MIT licensed TypeScript framework and cloud platform for building multiplayer and real time applications, aimed at developers who want to add collaborative or live features without operating real time infrastructure themselves.

read the full partykit overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 43K

Related comparisons

plane vs jitsi plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip plane vs anki twenty vs anki odoo vs anki cal-com vs anki plane vs tutor twenty vs tutor odoo vs tutor cal-com vs tutor plane vs hrms plane vs ever-gauzy twenty vs hrms twenty vs ever-gauzy odoo vs hrms odoo vs ever-gauzy plane vs horilla twenty vs horilla

More Collaboration & Communication projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Collaboration & Communication field.

Jitsi vs Plane Jitsi vs Rocket.Chat Jitsi vs cobalt Jitsi vs Buzz Jitsi vs srs Jitsi vs Huly Jitsi vs Zulip Jitsi vs etherpad Jitsi vs drawnix Jitsi vs univer Jitsi vs chat Jitsi vs bigbluebutton

Frequently asked questions

Is Jitsi or partykit more popular?

Jitsi has 29,931 GitHub stars and partykit has 5,710. Jitsi has the larger community by that measure.

Are Jitsi and partykit free?

Both are open source. Jitsi is licensed under Apache-2.0 and partykit under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Jitsi and partykit?

Jitsi is written in TypeScript and partykit in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Jitsi or partykit?

Choose Jitsi if you want the larger community (29,931 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose partykit if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.