head to head · open source

Jitsi vs FluidFramework

Jitsi has 29,931 GitHub stars, 8,026 forks, 141 open issues and last shipped yesterday. FluidFramework has 4,946 stars, 586 forks, 207 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Jitsi leads on adoption by 505% (29,931 vs 4,946 stars). Jitsi is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; FluidFramework is written in TypeScript under MIT. Jitsi has attracted 27% as many forks as stars, FluidFramework 12%. FluidFramework was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Jitsi ★ 30K FluidFramework ★ 4.9K category Business Software

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Jitsi FluidFramework
GitHub stars ★ 30K ★ 4.9K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 8.0K ⑂ 586
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Jitsi if

  • You weight community size — 30K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Jitsi profile →

pick FluidFramework if

  • You want the FluidFramework feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and FluidFramework fits your workflow better

full FluidFramework profile →

About Jitsi

Jitsi Meet is an open source video conferencing platform built on WebRTC standards, designed for privacy focused, account free video calls. It operates as a standalone web application or embeddable component, supporting both browser based and native mobile usage without requiring user accounts to join meetings. The project lives in the video communication ecosystem, competing directly with proprietary services like Zoom, Google Meet, and Slack’s built in calling.

read the full Jitsi overview →

About FluidFramework

FluidFramework is an MIT licensed TypeScript library from Microsoft for building distributed, real time collaborative web applications in JavaScript or TypeScript, aimed at developers who need shared, synchronized state across many clients without assembling that synchronization layer themselves.

read the full FluidFramework overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 43K

Related comparisons

plane vs jitsi plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip plane vs anki twenty vs anki odoo vs anki cal-com vs anki plane vs tutor twenty vs tutor odoo vs tutor cal-com vs tutor plane vs hrms plane vs ever-gauzy twenty vs hrms twenty vs ever-gauzy odoo vs hrms odoo vs ever-gauzy plane vs horilla twenty vs horilla

More Collaboration & Communication projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Collaboration & Communication field.

Jitsi vs Plane Jitsi vs Rocket.Chat Jitsi vs cobalt Jitsi vs Buzz Jitsi vs srs Jitsi vs Huly Jitsi vs Zulip Jitsi vs etherpad Jitsi vs drawnix Jitsi vs univer Jitsi vs chat Jitsi vs bigbluebutton

Frequently asked questions

Is Jitsi or FluidFramework more popular?

Jitsi has 29,931 GitHub stars and FluidFramework has 4,946. Jitsi has the larger community by that measure.

Are Jitsi and FluidFramework free?

Both are open source. Jitsi is licensed under Apache-2.0 and FluidFramework under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Jitsi and FluidFramework?

Jitsi is written in TypeScript and FluidFramework in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Jitsi or FluidFramework?

Choose Jitsi if you want the larger community (29,931 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose FluidFramework if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.