head to head · open source

Jan vs catai

Jan has 44,566 GitHub stars, 3,040 forks, 521 open issues and last shipped yesterday. catai has 500 stars, 39 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped 10 months ago. Jan leads on adoption by 8,813% (44,566 vs 500 stars). Jan is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; catai is written in TypeScript under MIT. Jan has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, catai 8%. Jan was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (chatgpt, llm), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Jan ★ 45K catai ★ 500 category AI & Machine Learning

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Jan catai
GitHub stars ★ 45K ★ 500
License Custom / other MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-19 2025-11-16
Forks ⑂ 3.0K ⑂ 39
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Jan if

  • You weight community size — 45K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Jan profile →

pick catai if

  • You want the catai feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and catai fits your workflow better

full catai profile →

About Jan

Jan is an open source desktop application that serves as a ChatGPT replacement, enabling users to run large language models (LLMs) locally on their machines or connect to cloud based providers like OpenAI and Anthropic. It is built with Tauri, TypeScript, and integrates llama.cpp for efficient local inference, targeting privacy conscious users who want full control over their AI workflows without sending data to third parties.

read the full Jan overview →

About catai

catai is an MIT licensed TypeScript command line tool that runs GGUF language models on your own computer and serves them through a chat interface and a small Node.js API, built for developers who want a private AI assistant without a hosted service.

read the full catai overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 390K Hermes Agent ★ 247K Ollama ★ 181K Dify ★ 157K Open WebUI ★ 153K langchain ★ 147K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs opencode openclaw vs n8n openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs comfyui openclaw vs odysseus openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm openclaw vs ollama ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs odysseus ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai open-webui vs gpt4all openclaw vs dify openclaw vs multica openclaw vs langgraph n8n vs dify dify vs langflow dify vs open-webui dify vs langchain dify vs ponytail

More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.

Jan vs OpenClaw Jan vs Hermes Agent Jan vs Open WebUI Jan vs ComfyUI Jan vs odysseus Jan vs LobeChat Jan vs AnythingLLM Jan vs Cherry Studio Jan vs nanobot Jan vs LibreChat Jan vs chatbox Jan vs AstrBot

Frequently asked questions

Is Jan or catai more popular?

Jan has 44,566 GitHub stars and catai has 500. Jan has the larger community by that measure.

Are Jan and catai free?

Both are open source. Jan has no licence declared in this registry, and catai is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Jan and catai?

Jan is written in TypeScript and catai in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Jan or catai?

Choose Jan if you want the larger community (44,566 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose catai if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.