head to head · open source

Insomnia vs WebApiClient

Insomnia has 40,022 GitHub stars, 2,366 forks, 874 open issues and last shipped yesterday. WebApiClient has 2,136 stars, 445 forks, 14 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. Insomnia leads on adoption by 1,774% (40,022 vs 2,136 stars). Insomnia is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; WebApiClient is written in C# under MIT. Insomnia has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, WebApiClient 21%. Insomnia was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Insomnia ★ 40K WebApiClient ★ 2.1K category Developer Tools

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

Insomnia WebApiClient
GitHub stars ★ 40K ★ 2.1K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript C#
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-07-17
Forks ⑂ 2.4K ⑂ 445
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Insomnia if

  • You weight community size — 40K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Insomnia profile →

pick WebApiClient if

  • You want the WebApiClient feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You evaluated both and WebApiClient fits your workflow better

full WebApiClient profile →

About Insomnia

Insomnia is an open source, cross platform API client built with Electron and TypeScript for developing and testing APIs across multiple protocols including REST, GraphQL, WebSockets, SSE, and gRPC. It runs on macOS, Windows, and Linux and is distributed under the Apache 2.0 license. The project serves as a direct open source alternative to Postman, offering similar core functionality without vendor lock in or mandatory cloud usage.

read the full Insomnia overview →

About WebApiClient

WebApiClient is an MIT licensed C REST API client library for .NET developers who declare HTTP endpoints as interfaces instead of hand writing HttpClient plumbing.

read the full WebApiClient overview →

More in Developer Tools

react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 208K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K

Related comparisons

fastapi vs insomnia fastapi vs hoppscotch fastapi vs bruno fastapi vs one-api fastapi vs openapi-specification fastapi vs openapi-generator fastapi vs redoc hoppscotch vs bruno openclaw vs langflow n8n vs langflow langflow vs langchain langflow vs supabase n8n vs tooljet n8n vs appsmith n8n vs budibase langflow vs pocketbase openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip

More API Development & Testing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.

Insomnia vs fastapi Insomnia vs Hoppscotch Insomnia vs Bruno Insomnia vs one-api Insomnia vs OpenAPI-Specification Insomnia vs openapi-generator Insomnia vs redoc Insomnia vs SafeLine Insomnia vs Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF Insomnia vs grpc-gateway Insomnia vs Yaak Insomnia vs hurl

Frequently asked questions

Is Insomnia or WebApiClient more popular?

Insomnia has 40,022 GitHub stars and WebApiClient has 2,136. Insomnia has the larger community by that measure.

Are Insomnia and WebApiClient free?

Both are open source. Insomnia is licensed under Apache-2.0 and WebApiClient under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Insomnia and WebApiClient?

Insomnia is written in TypeScript and WebApiClient in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Insomnia or WebApiClient?

Choose Insomnia if you want the larger community (40,022 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose WebApiClient if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.