head to head · open source

Insomnia vs fuego

Insomnia has 40,022 GitHub stars, 2,366 forks, 874 open issues and last shipped yesterday. fuego has 1,775 stars, 129 forks, 18 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. Insomnia leads on adoption by 2,155% (40,022 vs 1,775 stars). Insomnia is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; fuego is written in Go under MIT. Insomnia has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, fuego 7%. Insomnia was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Insomnia ★ 40K fuego ★ 1.8K category Developer Tools

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

Insomnia fuego
GitHub stars ★ 40K ★ 1.8K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript Go
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-15
Forks ⑂ 2.4K ⑂ 129
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Insomnia if

  • You weight community size — 40K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Insomnia profile →

pick fuego if

  • You want the fuego feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and fuego fits your workflow better

full fuego profile →

About Insomnia

Insomnia is an open source, cross platform API client built with Electron and TypeScript for developing and testing APIs across multiple protocols including REST, GraphQL, WebSockets, SSE, and gRPC. It runs on macOS, Windows, and Linux and is distributed under the Apache 2.0 license. The project serves as a direct open source alternative to Postman, offering similar core functionality without vendor lock in or mandatory cloud usage.

read the full Insomnia overview →

About fuego

Fuego is an MIT licensed, production ready Go web framework that generates an OpenAPI 3 specification directly from source code, aimed at Go developers building HTTP APIs and web applications who want their documentation to stay in sync with their handlers.

read the full fuego overview →

More in Developer Tools

react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 208K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K

Related comparisons

fastapi vs insomnia fastapi vs hoppscotch fastapi vs bruno fastapi vs one-api fastapi vs openapi-specification fastapi vs openapi-generator fastapi vs redoc hoppscotch vs bruno openclaw vs langflow n8n vs langflow langflow vs langchain langflow vs supabase n8n vs tooljet n8n vs appsmith n8n vs budibase langflow vs pocketbase openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip

More API Development & Testing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.

Insomnia vs fastapi Insomnia vs Hoppscotch Insomnia vs Bruno Insomnia vs one-api Insomnia vs OpenAPI-Specification Insomnia vs openapi-generator Insomnia vs redoc Insomnia vs SafeLine Insomnia vs Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF Insomnia vs grpc-gateway Insomnia vs Yaak Insomnia vs hurl

Frequently asked questions

Is Insomnia or fuego more popular?

Insomnia has 40,022 GitHub stars and fuego has 1,775. Insomnia has the larger community by that measure.

Are Insomnia and fuego free?

Both are open source. Insomnia is licensed under Apache-2.0 and fuego under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Insomnia and fuego?

Insomnia is written in TypeScript and fuego in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Insomnia or fuego?

Choose Insomnia if you want the larger community (40,022 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose fuego if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.