head to head · open source

hurl vs swag

hurl has 19,203 GitHub stars, 745 forks, 200 open issues and last shipped yesterday. swag has 13,024 stars, 1,547 forks, 476 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. hurl leads on adoption by 47% (19,203 vs 13,024 stars). hurl is written in Rust under Apache-2.0; swag is written in Go under MIT. hurl has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, swag 12%. hurl was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

hurl ★ 19K swag ★ 13K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

hurl swag
GitHub stars ★ 19K ★ 13K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Rust Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-13
Forks ⑂ 745 ⑂ 1.5K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick hurl if

  • You weight community size — 19K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full hurl profile →

pick swag if

  • You want the swag feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and swag fits your workflow better

full swag profile →

About hurl

Hurl is a command line tool that runs HTTP requests defined in a simple plain text format. It lives in the Rust ecosystem, is licensed under Apache 2.0, and is powered under the hood by libcurl, so it inherits curl's transfer behavior while adding a readable file format on top. A single Hurl file can chain multiple requests, capture values from one response, and reuse those values in later requests, which makes it possible to describe an entire HTTP session rather than a single call. The project has been on GitHub for six years and carries roughly 19,000 stars and 744 forks.

read the full hurl overview →

About swag

Swag is a command line tool that converts Go source annotations into Swagger 2.0 documentation. It lives in the Go ecosystem, is distributed under the MIT license, and is maintained by the swaggo organization. The project has been active for nine years, with the most recent push recorded in September 2026, and it carries roughly 13,000 stars and 1,545 forks on GitHub.

read the full swag overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

fastapi vs hoppscotch fastapi vs bruno fastapi vs insomnia fastapi vs one-api fastapi vs openapi-specification fastapi vs openapi-generator fastapi vs redoc hoppscotch vs bruno opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More API Development & Testing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.

hurl vs fastapi hurl vs Hoppscotch hurl vs Bruno hurl vs Insomnia hurl vs one-api hurl vs OpenAPI-Specification hurl vs openapi-generator hurl vs redoc hurl vs SafeLine hurl vs Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF hurl vs grpc-gateway hurl vs Yaak

Frequently asked questions

Is hurl or swag more popular?

hurl has 19,203 GitHub stars and swag has 13,024. hurl has the larger community by that measure.

Are hurl and swag free?

Both are open source. hurl is licensed under Apache-2.0 and swag under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between hurl and swag?

hurl is written in Rust and swag in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, hurl or swag?

Choose hurl if you want the larger community (19,203 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose swag if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.