head to head · open source

Huly vs partykit

Huly has 27,700 GitHub stars, 2,155 forks, 849 open issues and last shipped yesterday. partykit has 5,710 stars, 200 forks, 93 open issues and last shipped 8 months ago. Huly leads on adoption by 385% (27,700 vs 5,710 stars). Huly is written in TypeScript under EPL-2.0; partykit is written in TypeScript under MIT. Huly has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, partykit 4%. Huly was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Huly ★ 28K partykit ★ 5.7K category Business Software

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Huly partykit
GitHub stars ★ 28K ★ 5.7K
License EPL-2.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-01-29
Forks ⑂ 2.2K ⑂ 200
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Huly if

  • You weight community size — 28K stars and counting
  • You want the EPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Huly profile →

pick partykit if

  • You want the partykit feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and partykit fits your workflow better

full partykit profile →

About Huly

Huly is an open source, EPL 2.0 licensed, TypeScript built all in one work platform that folds project management, issue tracking, chat, CRM, HRM and applicant tracking into one system teams can run on their own servers, aimed at organisations that want the ground Jira, Linear, ClickUp, Slack and Notion cover without renting it from five separate vendors.

read the full Huly overview →

About partykit

PartyKit is an open source, MIT licensed TypeScript framework and cloud platform for building multiplayer and real time applications, aimed at developers who want to add collaborative or live features without operating real time infrastructure themselves.

read the full partykit overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 43K

Related comparisons

plane vs huly plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs zulip plane vs anki twenty vs anki odoo vs anki cal-com vs anki plane vs tutor twenty vs tutor odoo vs tutor cal-com vs tutor plane vs hrms plane vs ever-gauzy twenty vs hrms twenty vs ever-gauzy odoo vs hrms odoo vs ever-gauzy plane vs horilla twenty vs horilla

More Collaboration & Communication projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Collaboration & Communication field.

Huly vs Plane Huly vs Rocket.Chat Huly vs cobalt Huly vs Buzz Huly vs Jitsi Huly vs srs Huly vs Zulip Huly vs etherpad Huly vs drawnix Huly vs univer Huly vs chat Huly vs bigbluebutton

Frequently asked questions

Is Huly or partykit more popular?

Huly has 27,700 GitHub stars and partykit has 5,710. Huly has the larger community by that measure.

Are Huly and partykit free?

Both are open source. Huly is licensed under EPL-2.0 and partykit under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Huly and partykit?

Huly is written in TypeScript and partykit in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Huly or partykit?

Choose Huly if you want the larger community (27,700 stars) or its EPL-2.0 licence terms. Choose partykit if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.