head to head · open source
hugo vs suneditor
hugo has 90,171 GitHub stars, 8,392 forks, 235 open issues and last shipped yesterday. suneditor has 2,021 stars, 348 forks, 3 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. hugo leads on adoption by 4,362% (90,171 vs 2,021 stars). hugo is written in Go under Apache-2.0; suneditor is written in JavaScript under MIT. hugo has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, suneditor 17%. hugo was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (cms), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| hugo | suneditor | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 90K | ★ 2.0K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Go | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-10-19 | 2026-10-18 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.4K | ⑂ 348 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick hugo if
- You weight community size — 90K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick suneditor if
- You want the suneditor feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and suneditor fits your workflow better
About hugo
[Clang]: [GCC]: [Git]: [Go]: [bep]: [bugs]: [contributing]: CONTRIBUTING.md [create a proposal]: [dart sass]: [details]: [documentation repository]: [documentation]: [dragonfly bsd, freebsd, netbsd, and openbsd]: [features]: [forum]: [friends]: [hugo modules]: [installation]: [issue queue]: [linux]: [macos]: [prebuilt binary]: [requesting help]: [spf13]: [static site generator]: [support]: [themes]: [transpile sass to css]: [website]: [windows]: A fast and flexible static site generator built with love by [bep][], [spf13][], and [friends][] in Go. [Website][] [Installation][] [Documentation][] [Support][]…
About suneditor
A modular WYSIWYG HTML editor with zero runtime dependencies. Everything included. Enable only what you need. Live Playground · Documentation · Get Started · Frameworks Tables, images, video, audio and files — resize, align, captions, galleries and uploads built in Markdown, math and code blocks — GFM Markdown view, LaTeX math, code blocks with a language selector Slash commands and block handles — / command menu, drag handles to move blocks Mentions, find & replace, templates, PDF export, drawing — and more, as opt in plugins TypeScript — bundled type definitions for options, plugins and the public API Works…
read the full suneditor overview →
More in Content & Publishing
Related comparisons
More Content Management Systems (CMS) projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Content Management Systems (CMS) field.
Frequently asked questions
Is hugo or suneditor more popular?
hugo has 90,171 GitHub stars and suneditor has 2,021. hugo has the larger community by that measure.
Are hugo and suneditor free?
Both are open source. hugo is licensed under Apache-2.0 and suneditor under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between hugo and suneditor?
hugo is written in Go and suneditor in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, hugo or suneditor?
Choose hugo if you want the larger community (90,171 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose suneditor if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.