head to head · open source
hugo vs studiocms
hugo has 90,326 GitHub stars, 8,447 forks, 235 open issues and last shipped yesterday. studiocms has 841 stars, 60 forks, 20 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. hugo leads on adoption by 10,640% (90,326 vs 841 stars). hugo is written in Go under Apache-2.0; studiocms is written in TypeScript under MIT. hugo has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, studiocms 7%. hugo was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (cms, content-management-system), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| hugo | studiocms | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 90K | ★ 841 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Go | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-01 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.4K | ⑂ 60 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick hugo if
- You weight community size — 90K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick studiocms if
- You want the studiocms feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and studiocms fits your workflow better
About hugo
[Clang]: [GCC]: [Git]: [Go]: [bep]: [bugs]: [contributing]: CONTRIBUTING.md [create a proposal]: [dart sass]: [details]: [documentation repository]: [documentation]: [dragonfly bsd, freebsd, netbsd, and openbsd]: [features]: [forum]: [friends]: [hugo modules]: [installation]: [issue queue]: [linux]: [macos]: [prebuilt binary]: [requesting help]: [spf13]: [static site generator]: [support]: [themes]: [transpile sass to css]: [website]: [windows]: A fast and flexible static site generator built with love by [bep][], [spf13][], and [friends][] in Go. [Website][] [Installation][] [Documentation][] [Support][]…
About studiocms
StudioCMS StudioCMS is an SSR Headless CMS built for the Astro Ecosystem. To see how to get started with StudioCMS, check out the StudioCMS Docs. Packages in this repository Astro Integrations StudioCMS Plugins Tools and Utilities Getting Started with our Development Playground The StudioCMS Playground is intended for usage when developing StudioCMS within the monorepo and should not be used to directly test or host StudioCMS. If your goal is to test our CMS, please use our latest release from npm. Steps to get a running playground should be the following: Clone the GitHub repository Run pnpm i frozen lockfile…
read the full studiocms overview →
More in Content & Publishing
Related comparisons
More Content Management Systems (CMS) projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Content Management Systems (CMS) field.
Frequently asked questions
Is hugo or studiocms more popular?
hugo has 90,326 GitHub stars and studiocms has 841. hugo has the larger community by that measure.
Are hugo and studiocms free?
Both are open source. hugo is licensed under Apache-2.0 and studiocms under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between hugo and studiocms?
hugo is written in Go and studiocms in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, hugo or studiocms?
Choose hugo if you want the larger community (90,326 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose studiocms if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.