head to head · open source
hugo vs strapi-tool-dockerize
hugo has 90,326 GitHub stars, 8,447 forks, 235 open issues and last shipped yesterday. strapi-tool-dockerize has 622 stars, 37 forks, 9 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. hugo leads on adoption by 14,422% (90,326 vs 622 stars). hugo is written in Go under Apache-2.0; strapi-tool-dockerize is written in JavaScript under MIT. hugo has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, strapi-tool-dockerize 6%. hugo was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| hugo | strapi-tool-dockerize | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 90K | ★ 622 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Go | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-07-09 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.4K | ⑂ 37 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick hugo if
- You weight community size — 90K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick strapi-tool-dockerize if
- You want the strapi-tool-dockerize feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and strapi-tool-dockerize fits your workflow better
About hugo
[Clang]: [GCC]: [Git]: [Go]: [bep]: [bugs]: [contributing]: CONTRIBUTING.md [create a proposal]: [dart sass]: [details]: [documentation repository]: [documentation]: [dragonfly bsd, freebsd, netbsd, and openbsd]: [features]: [forum]: [friends]: [hugo modules]: [installation]: [issue queue]: [linux]: [macos]: [prebuilt binary]: [requesting help]: [spf13]: [static site generator]: [support]: [themes]: [transpile sass to css]: [website]: [windows]: A fast and flexible static site generator built with love by [bep][], [spf13][], and [friends][] in Go. [Website][] [Installation][] [Documentation][] [Support][]…
About strapi-tool-dockerize
@Strapi community/dockerize Add docker support for a Strapi Project with ease 🚀 Feel free to buy @Eventyret a ☕️ if this tool was helpful Open Collective Table of Contents 🚦 Current Status ✨ Usage 🤖 Using CLI Arguments 🧹 Resetting project 🚀 Features 🐳 Docker compose support 🎗 Contributing ⭐️ Show your support 🔗 Links 🌎 Community support 🙋♀️ Authors 🙋♂️ Contributors (Thank you 🙏) 🔖 License 🚦 Current Status This package is currently under development and should be consider STABLE in terms of state. I/We are currently accepting contributions and/or dedicated contributors to help develop and maintain…
read the full strapi-tool-dockerize overview →
More in Content & Publishing
Related comparisons
More Content Management Systems (CMS) projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Content Management Systems (CMS) field.
Frequently asked questions
Is hugo or strapi-tool-dockerize more popular?
hugo has 90,326 GitHub stars and strapi-tool-dockerize has 622. hugo has the larger community by that measure.
Are hugo and strapi-tool-dockerize free?
Both are open source. hugo is licensed under Apache-2.0 and strapi-tool-dockerize under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between hugo and strapi-tool-dockerize?
hugo is written in Go and strapi-tool-dockerize in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, hugo or strapi-tool-dockerize?
Choose hugo if you want the larger community (90,326 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose strapi-tool-dockerize if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.