head to head · open source
hugo vs pagible
hugo has 90,326 GitHub stars, 8,447 forks, 235 open issues and last shipped yesterday. pagible has 602 stars, 15 forks, 9 open issues and last shipped yesterday. hugo leads on adoption by 14,904% (90,326 vs 602 stars). hugo is written in Go under Apache-2.0; pagible is written in PHP under MIT. hugo has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, pagible 2%. pagible was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (cms, content-management-system), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| hugo | pagible | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 90K | ★ 602 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Go | PHP |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.4K | ⑂ 15 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick hugo if
- You weight community size — 90K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick pagible if
- You want the pagible feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches PHP
- You evaluated both and pagible fits your workflow better
About hugo
[Clang]: [GCC]: [Git]: [Go]: [bep]: [bugs]: [contributing]: CONTRIBUTING.md [create a proposal]: [dart sass]: [details]: [documentation repository]: [documentation]: [dragonfly bsd, freebsd, netbsd, and openbsd]: [features]: [forum]: [friends]: [hugo modules]: [installation]: [issue queue]: [linux]: [macos]: [prebuilt binary]: [requesting help]: [spf13]: [static site generator]: [support]: [themes]: [transpile sass to css]: [website]: [windows]: A fast and flexible static site generator built with love by [bep][], [spf13][], and [friends][] in Go. [Website][] [Installation][] [Documentation][] [Support][]…
About pagible
PagibleAI CMS Simple as Wordpress, the power of Contentful! The easy, flexible and scalable API first PagibleAI CMS package for Laravel. Table of Contents About Features Tech Stack Architecture Project Structure Getting Started Selling access to restricted pages Configuration Maintenance Multi domain Multi tenancy MCP API Security Contributing What's Next License Acknowledgements Links About PagibleAI CMS is an API first content management system that can be installed into any existing Laravel application. It combines the ease of use of WordPress with the structured content management capabilities of Contentful…
read the full pagible overview →
More in Content & Publishing
Related comparisons
More Content Management Systems (CMS) projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Content Management Systems (CMS) field.
Frequently asked questions
Is hugo or pagible more popular?
hugo has 90,326 GitHub stars and pagible has 602. hugo has the larger community by that measure.
Are hugo and pagible free?
Both are open source. hugo is licensed under Apache-2.0 and pagible under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between hugo and pagible?
hugo is written in Go and pagible in PHP. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, hugo or pagible?
Choose hugo if you want the larger community (90,326 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose pagible if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.