head to head · open source
hugo vs next-wp
hugo has 90,326 GitHub stars, 8,447 forks, 235 open issues and last shipped yesterday. next-wp has 1,304 stars, 327 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. hugo leads on adoption by 6,827% (90,326 vs 1,304 stars). hugo is written in Go under Apache-2.0; next-wp is written in TypeScript under MIT. hugo has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, next-wp 25%. hugo was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| hugo | next-wp | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 90K | ★ 1.3K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Go | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-08-06 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.4K | ⑂ 327 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick hugo if
- You weight community size — 90K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick next-wp if
- You want the next-wp feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and next-wp fits your workflow better
About hugo
[Clang]: [GCC]: [Git]: [Go]: [bep]: [bugs]: [contributing]: CONTRIBUTING.md [create a proposal]: [dart sass]: [details]: [documentation repository]: [documentation]: [dragonfly bsd, freebsd, netbsd, and openbsd]: [features]: [forum]: [friends]: [hugo modules]: [installation]: [issue queue]: [linux]: [macos]: [prebuilt binary]: [requesting help]: [spf13]: [static site generator]: [support]: [themes]: [transpile sass to css]: [website]: [windows]: A fast and flexible static site generator built with love by [bep][], [spf13][], and [friends][] in Go. [Website][] [Installation][] [Documentation][] [Support][]…
About next-wp
Next WP A modern headless WordPress starter built with Next.js 16, React 19, and TypeScript. %2C%20the%20hostname%20for%20Image%20rendering%20in%20Next%20JS%20(ie.%20wp.example.com)%2C%20and%20a%20secret%20key%20for%20secure%20revalidation&project name=next wp&repository name=next wp&demo title=Next%20JS%20and%20WordPress%20Starter&demo url=https%3A%2F%2Fwp.9d8.dev) Live Demo Video Tutorial Headless Theme (761) Need a WooCommerce version? Try next woo Table of Contents Quick Start Prerequisites Environment Variables Features Project Structure Deployment Railway (Recommended) Vercel Local Development WordPress…
read the full next-wp overview →
More in Content & Publishing
Related comparisons
More Content Management Systems (CMS) projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Content Management Systems (CMS) field.
Frequently asked questions
Is hugo or next-wp more popular?
hugo has 90,326 GitHub stars and next-wp has 1,304. hugo has the larger community by that measure.
Are hugo and next-wp free?
Both are open source. hugo is licensed under Apache-2.0 and next-wp under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between hugo and next-wp?
hugo is written in Go and next-wp in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, hugo or next-wp?
Choose hugo if you want the larger community (90,326 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose next-wp if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.