head to head · open source
hugo vs intlayer
hugo has 90,326 GitHub stars, 8,447 forks, 235 open issues and last shipped yesterday. intlayer has 862 stars, 129 forks, 12 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. hugo leads on adoption by 10,379% (90,326 vs 862 stars). hugo is written in Go under Apache-2.0; intlayer is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. hugo has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, intlayer 15%. hugo was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (cms), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| hugo | intlayer | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 90K | ★ 862 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Go | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-01 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.4K | ⑂ 129 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick hugo if
- You weight community size — 90K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick intlayer if
- You want the intlayer feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and intlayer fits your workflow better
About hugo
[Clang]: [GCC]: [Git]: [Go]: [bep]: [bugs]: [contributing]: CONTRIBUTING.md [create a proposal]: [dart sass]: [details]: [documentation repository]: [documentation]: [dragonfly bsd, freebsd, netbsd, and openbsd]: [features]: [forum]: [friends]: [hugo modules]: [installation]: [issue queue]: [linux]: [macos]: [prebuilt binary]: [requesting help]: [spf13]: [static site generator]: [support]: [themes]: [transpile sass to css]: [website]: [windows]: A fast and flexible static site generator built with love by [bep][], [spf13][], and [friends][] in Go. [Website][] [Installation][] [Documentation][] [Support][]…
About intlayer
Per component i18n AI powered translation. Visual Editor. Multilingual CMS. Docs • Next.js • React + Vite • CMS • Discord What is Intlayer? Most i18n libraries are either too complex, too rigid, or not built for modern frameworks. Intlayer is a modern i18n solution for web and mobile apps. It’s framework agnostic, AI powered , and includes a free CMS & visual editor . With per locale content files , TypeScript autocompletion , tree shakable dictionaries , and CI/CD integration , Intlayer makes internationalization faster, cleaner, and smarter . Keys benefits of Intlayer:
read the full intlayer overview →
More in Content & Publishing
Related comparisons
More Content Management Systems (CMS) projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Content Management Systems (CMS) field.
Frequently asked questions
Is hugo or intlayer more popular?
hugo has 90,326 GitHub stars and intlayer has 862. hugo has the larger community by that measure.
Are hugo and intlayer free?
Both are open source. hugo is licensed under Apache-2.0 and intlayer under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between hugo and intlayer?
hugo is written in Go and intlayer in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, hugo or intlayer?
Choose hugo if you want the larger community (90,326 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose intlayer if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.