head to head · open source
hugo vs fastschema
hugo has 89,854 GitHub stars, 8,381 forks, 235 open issues and last shipped yesterday. fastschema has 573 stars, 55 forks, 32 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. hugo leads on adoption by 15,581% (89,854 vs 573 stars). hugo is written in Go under Apache-2.0; fastschema is written in Go under MIT. hugo has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, fastschema 10%. hugo was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (cms), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| hugo | fastschema | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 90K | ★ 573 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Go | Go |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-07-11 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.4K | ⑂ 55 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick hugo if
- You weight community size — 90K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick fastschema if
- You want the fastschema feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and fastschema fits your workflow better
About hugo
Hugo is a static site generator written in Go that renders a complete site in seconds, often less, and it is aimed at developers, technical writers, and content teams who build blogs, documentation sites, portfolios, landing pages, and corporate sites as static files.
About fastschema
FastSchema is an MIT licensed, Go based Backend as a Service and web framework that turns a declared schema into database tables and RESTful CRUD APIs, built for developers and no code teams creating headless CMS platforms and dynamic web applications.
read the full fastschema overview →
More in Content & Publishing
Related comparisons
More Content Management Systems (CMS) projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Content Management Systems (CMS) field.
Frequently asked questions
Is hugo or fastschema more popular?
hugo has 89,854 GitHub stars and fastschema has 573. hugo has the larger community by that measure.
Are hugo and fastschema free?
Both are open source. hugo is licensed under Apache-2.0 and fastschema under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between hugo and fastschema?
hugo is written in Go and fastschema in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, hugo or fastschema?
Choose hugo if you want the larger community (89,854 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose fastschema if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.