head to head · open source
hugo vs fastschema
hugo has 90,326 GitHub stars, 8,447 forks, 235 open issues and last shipped yesterday. fastschema has 574 stars, 56 forks, 32 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. hugo leads on adoption by 15,636% (90,326 vs 574 stars). hugo is written in Go under Apache-2.0; fastschema is written in Go under MIT. hugo has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, fastschema 10%. hugo was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (cms), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| hugo | fastschema | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 90K | ★ 574 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Go | Go |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-07-11 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.4K | ⑂ 56 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick hugo if
- You weight community size — 90K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick fastschema if
- You want the fastschema feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and fastschema fits your workflow better
About hugo
[Clang]: [GCC]: [Git]: [Go]: [bep]: [bugs]: [contributing]: CONTRIBUTING.md [create a proposal]: [dart sass]: [details]: [documentation repository]: [documentation]: [dragonfly bsd, freebsd, netbsd, and openbsd]: [features]: [forum]: [friends]: [hugo modules]: [installation]: [issue queue]: [linux]: [macos]: [prebuilt binary]: [requesting help]: [spf13]: [static site generator]: [support]: [themes]: [transpile sass to css]: [website]: [windows]: A fast and flexible static site generator built with love by [bep][], [spf13][], and [friends][] in Go. [Website][] [Installation][] [Documentation][] [Support][]…
About fastschema
Contributing Guidelines · Submit an Issue FastSchema is a Backend as a Service (BaaS) and Go web framework for building dynamic web applications. Designed to simplify backend development, FastSchema automates the generation of databases, provides ready to use CRUD APIs, and offers tools for managing structured content effortlessly Table of Contents Introduction Try it out Run the Docker Container Overview Use Cases Web Framework Features Documentation Roadmap Testing Dependencies Contributing Community License Introduction Check out our introduction video to get a quick overview of FastSchema: Try it out Launch…
read the full fastschema overview →
More in Content & Publishing
Related comparisons
More Content Management Systems (CMS) projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Content Management Systems (CMS) field.
Frequently asked questions
Is hugo or fastschema more popular?
hugo has 90,326 GitHub stars and fastschema has 574. hugo has the larger community by that measure.
Are hugo and fastschema free?
Both are open source. hugo is licensed under Apache-2.0 and fastschema under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between hugo and fastschema?
hugo is written in Go and fastschema in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, hugo or fastschema?
Choose hugo if you want the larger community (90,326 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose fastschema if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.