head to head · open source
hugo vs Dnn.Platform
hugo has 90,326 GitHub stars, 8,447 forks, 235 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Dnn.Platform has 1,140 stars, 793 forks, 331 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. hugo leads on adoption by 7,823% (90,326 vs 1,140 stars). hugo is written in Go under Apache-2.0; Dnn.Platform is written in C# under MIT. hugo has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, Dnn.Platform 70%. hugo was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (cms), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| hugo | Dnn.Platform | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 90K | ★ 1.1K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Go | C# |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-28 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.4K | ⑂ 793 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick hugo if
- You weight community size — 90K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Dnn.Platform if
- You want the Dnn.Platform feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches C#
- You evaluated both and Dnn.Platform fits your workflow better
About hugo
[Clang]: [GCC]: [Git]: [Go]: [bep]: [bugs]: [contributing]: CONTRIBUTING.md [create a proposal]: [dart sass]: [details]: [documentation repository]: [documentation]: [dragonfly bsd, freebsd, netbsd, and openbsd]: [features]: [forum]: [friends]: [hugo modules]: [installation]: [issue queue]: [linux]: [macos]: [prebuilt binary]: [requesting help]: [spf13]: [static site generator]: [support]: [themes]: [transpile sass to css]: [website]: [windows]: A fast and flexible static site generator built with love by [bep][], [spf13][], and [friends][] in Go. [Website][] [Installation][] [Documentation][] [Support][]…
About Dnn.Platform
Project Description DNN® ( formerly DotNetNuke® ) is the leading open source web content management platform (CMS) in the Microsoft ecosystem. The product is used to build professional looking and easy to use commercial websites, social intranets, community portals, or partner extranets. Containing dynamic content of all types, DNN sites are easy to deploy and update. The DNN Platform has been downloaded more than 8 million times and powers over 750,000 websites globally. A community of more than 1 million members forms a powerful support network. Thousands of free and commercial extensions, apps, and skins are…
read the full Dnn.Platform overview →
More in Content & Publishing
Related comparisons
More Content Management Systems (CMS) projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Content Management Systems (CMS) field.
Frequently asked questions
Is hugo or Dnn.Platform more popular?
hugo has 90,326 GitHub stars and Dnn.Platform has 1,140. hugo has the larger community by that measure.
Are hugo and Dnn.Platform free?
Both are open source. hugo is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Dnn.Platform under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between hugo and Dnn.Platform?
hugo is written in Go and Dnn.Platform in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, hugo or Dnn.Platform?
Choose hugo if you want the larger community (90,326 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Dnn.Platform if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.