head to head · open source
hugo vs CMSeeK
hugo has 90,326 GitHub stars, 8,447 forks, 235 open issues and last shipped yesterday. CMSeeK has 2,594 stars, 515 forks, 36 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. hugo leads on adoption by 3,382% (90,326 vs 2,594 stars). hugo is written in Go under Apache-2.0; CMSeeK is written in Python under GPL-3.0. hugo has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, CMSeeK 20%. hugo was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (cms, content-management-system), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| hugo | CMSeeK | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 90K | ★ 2.6K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Go | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-07-17 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.4K | ⑂ 515 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick hugo if
- You weight community size — 90K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick CMSeeK if
- You want the CMSeeK feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and CMSeeK fits your workflow better
About hugo
[Clang]: [GCC]: [Git]: [Go]: [bep]: [bugs]: [contributing]: CONTRIBUTING.md [create a proposal]: [dart sass]: [details]: [documentation repository]: [documentation]: [dragonfly bsd, freebsd, netbsd, and openbsd]: [features]: [forum]: [friends]: [hugo modules]: [installation]: [issue queue]: [linux]: [macos]: [prebuilt binary]: [requesting help]: [spf13]: [static site generator]: [support]: [themes]: [transpile sass to css]: [website]: [windows]: A fast and flexible static site generator built with love by [bep][], [spf13][], and [friends][] in Go. [Website][] [Installation][] [Documentation][] [Support][]…
About CMSeeK
What is a CMS? A content management system (CMS) manages the creation and modification of digital content. It typically supports multiple users in a collaborative environment. Some noteable examples are: WordPress, Joomla, Drupal etc . Release History Changelog File Functions Of CMSeek: Basic CMS Detection of over 180 CMS Drupal version detection Advanced Wordpress Scans Detects Version User Enumeration Plugins Enumeration Theme Enumeration Detects Users (3 Detection Methods) Looks for Version Vulnerabilities and much more! Advanced Joomla Scans Version detection Backup files finder Admin page finder Core…
read the full CMSeeK overview →
More in Content & Publishing
Related comparisons
More Content Management Systems (CMS) projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Content Management Systems (CMS) field.
Frequently asked questions
Is hugo or CMSeeK more popular?
hugo has 90,326 GitHub stars and CMSeeK has 2,594. hugo has the larger community by that measure.
Are hugo and CMSeeK free?
Both are open source. hugo is licensed under Apache-2.0 and CMSeeK under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between hugo and CMSeeK?
hugo is written in Go and CMSeeK in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, hugo or CMSeeK?
Choose hugo if you want the larger community (90,326 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose CMSeeK if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.