head to head · open source

hugo vs CMSeeK

hugo has 89,858 GitHub stars, 8,381 forks, 235 open issues and last shipped today. CMSeeK has 2,578 stars, 521 forks, 36 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. hugo leads on adoption by 3,386% (89,858 vs 2,578 stars). hugo is written in Go under Apache-2.0; CMSeeK is written in Python under GPL-3.0. hugo has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, CMSeeK 20%. hugo was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (cms, content-management-system), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

hugo ★ 90K CMSeeK ★ 2.6K category Content & Publishing

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

hugo CMSeeK
GitHub stars ★ 90K ★ 2.6K
License Apache-2.0 GPL-3.0
Written in Go Python
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-07-17
Forks ⑂ 8.4K ⑂ 521
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick hugo if

  • You weight community size — 90K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full hugo profile →

pick CMSeeK if

  • You want the CMSeeK feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and CMSeeK fits your workflow better

full CMSeeK profile →

About hugo

Hugo is a static site generator written in Go that renders a complete site in seconds, often less, and it is aimed at developers, technical writers, and content teams who build blogs, documentation sites, portfolios, landing pages, and corporate sites as static files.

read the full hugo overview →

About CMSeeK

What is a CMS? A content management system (CMS) manages the creation and modification of digital content. It typically supports multiple users in a collaborative environment. Some noteable examples are: WordPress, Joomla, Drupal etc . Release History Changelog File Functions Of CMSeek: Basic CMS Detection of over 180 CMS Drupal version detection Advanced Wordpress Scans Detects Version User Enumeration Plugins Enumeration Theme Enumeration Detects Users (3 Detection Methods) Looks for Version Vulnerabilities and much more! Advanced Joomla Scans Version detection Backup files finder Admin page finder Core vulnera…

read the full CMSeeK overview →

More in Content & Publishing

next.js ★ 142K storybook ★ 91K Understand-Anything ★ 83K Strapi ★ 73K nuxt ★ 61K gatsby ★ 56K

Related comparisons

hugo vs strapi hugo vs payload hugo vs halo hugo vs filament hugo vs wagtail hugo vs decap-cms strapi vs payload strapi vs halo next-js vs nuxt next-js vs gatsby next-js vs ghost next-js vs jekyll next-js vs hexo next-js vs nextra next-js vs kit next-js vs vike storybook vs understand-anything storybook vs devdocs storybook vs docsify understand-anything vs devdocs storybook vs wiki storybook vs mkdocs-material understand-anything vs docsify understand-anything vs wiki

More Content Management Systems (CMS) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Content Management Systems (CMS) field.

hugo vs Strapi hugo vs Payload hugo vs halo hugo vs filament hugo vs wagtail hugo vs decap-cms hugo vs TinaCMS hugo vs frappe hugo vs Instatic hugo vs OrchardCore hugo vs Publii hugo vs sanity

Frequently asked questions

Is hugo or CMSeeK more popular?

hugo has 89,858 GitHub stars and CMSeeK has 2,578. hugo has the larger community by that measure.

Are hugo and CMSeeK free?

Both are open source. hugo is licensed under Apache-2.0 and CMSeeK under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between hugo and CMSeeK?

hugo is written in Go and CMSeeK in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, hugo or CMSeeK?

Choose hugo if you want the larger community (89,858 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose CMSeeK if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.