head to head · open source
actions-gh-pages vs hugo-theme-academic-cv
actions-gh-pages has 5,362 GitHub stars, 450 forks, 95 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. hugo-theme-academic-cv has 5,069 stars, 6,442 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped today. actions-gh-pages leads on adoption by 6% (5,362 vs 5,069 stars). actions-gh-pages is written in TypeScript under MIT; hugo-theme-academic-cv is written in Jupyter Notebook under MIT. actions-gh-pages has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, hugo-theme-academic-cv 127%. hugo-theme-academic-cv was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (hugo), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| actions-gh-pages | hugo-theme-academic-cv | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 5.4K | ★ 5.1K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | Jupyter Notebook |
| Last push | 2026-09-15 | 2026-09-20 |
| Forks | ⑂ 450 | ⑂ 6.4K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick actions-gh-pages if
- You weight community size — 5.4K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick hugo-theme-academic-cv if
- You want the hugo-theme-academic-cv feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Jupyter Notebook
- You evaluated both and hugo-theme-academic-cv fits your workflow better
About actions-gh-pages
This project is a GitHub Action that deploys static files to GitHub Pages. It lives in the GitHub Actions ecosystem, is written in TypeScript, and is distributed under the MIT license. The action takes a build output directory from a workflow and publishes its contents to a branch that GitHub Pages serves, so a repository can go from committed source to a live site without any manual upload step. It is designed to pair with static site generators rather than to replace them, and the topic list names Hugo, MkDocs, Gatsby, mdBook, Next, Nuxt, and VuePress among the tools it is used alongside.
read the full actions-gh-pages overview →
About hugo-theme-academic-cv
hugo theme academic cv is MIT licensed Hugo theme and template for academic portfolios. It lives in HugoBlox ecosystem. It builds personal website from Markdown files. Repository category is Content & Publishing / Blogging & Personal Sites. Primary language shown is Jupyter Notebook. Topics include academic, academic website, blog engine, blogdown, digital garden, hugo, hugo academic, hugo site, hugo theme, netlify, obsidian, personal website. Page lists 5062 stars, 6446 forks, 9 years age, last push 2026 09 13.
read the full hugo-theme-academic-cv overview →
More in Content & Publishing
Related comparisons
More Blogging & Personal Sites projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Blogging & Personal Sites field.
Frequently asked questions
Is actions-gh-pages or hugo-theme-academic-cv more popular?
actions-gh-pages has 5,362 GitHub stars and hugo-theme-academic-cv has 5,069. actions-gh-pages has the larger community by that measure.
Are actions-gh-pages and hugo-theme-academic-cv free?
Both are open source. actions-gh-pages is licensed under MIT and hugo-theme-academic-cv under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between actions-gh-pages and hugo-theme-academic-cv?
actions-gh-pages is written in TypeScript and hugo-theme-academic-cv in Jupyter Notebook. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, actions-gh-pages or hugo-theme-academic-cv?
Choose actions-gh-pages if you want the larger community (5,362 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose hugo-theme-academic-cv if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.