head to head · open source

cubefs vs hue

cubefs has 5,660 GitHub stars, 714 forks, 265 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. hue has 1,411 stars, 412 forks, 32 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. cubefs leads on adoption by 301% (5,660 vs 1,411 stars). cubefs is written in Go under Apache-2.0; hue is written in JavaScript under Apache-2.0. cubefs has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, hue 29%. hue was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

cubefs ★ 5.7K hue ★ 1.4K category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

cubefs hue
GitHub stars ★ 5.7K ★ 1.4K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 714 ⑂ 412
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick cubefs if

  • You weight community size — 5.7K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full cubefs profile →

pick hue if

  • You want the hue feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and hue fits your workflow better

full hue profile →

About cubefs

CubeFS is an Apache 2.0, CNCF graduated cloud native distributed file and object storage system written in Go, built for teams that need POSIX, HDFS, S3, and REST access to a single storage layer across datacenters, private and hybrid clouds, and Kubernetes.

read the full cubefs overview →

About hue

Hue is an open source, Apache 2.0 licensed SQL Assistant service for databases and data warehouses, built for data analysts, data engineers, and platform teams that need a shared, browser based way to query and explore data instead of installing a separate client for every engine.

read the full hue overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Browser Use ★ 115K Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 82K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K

Related comparisons

mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse scrapling vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse mermaid vs apache-pinot clickhouse vs duckdb crawl4ai vs apache-pinot scrapling vs apache-pinot firecrawl vs scrapy firecrawl vs crawlee browser-use vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapling playwright vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapy playwright vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapling godot vs pixijs mermaid vs apache-superset three-js vs pixijs supabase vs metabase mermaid vs echarts grafana vs apache-superset apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase

More Data Warehousing & Processing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Warehousing & Processing field.

cubefs vs ClickHouse cubefs vs seaweedfs cubefs vs rustfs cubefs vs parse-server cubefs vs Apache Pinot cubefs vs dlt cubefs vs mountpoint-s3 cubefs vs bigquery-utils cubefs vs bigfunctions cubefs vs arc

Frequently asked questions

Is cubefs or hue more popular?

cubefs has 5,660 GitHub stars and hue has 1,411. cubefs has the larger community by that measure.

Are cubefs and hue free?

Both are open source. cubefs is licensed under Apache-2.0 and hue under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between cubefs and hue?

cubefs is written in Go and hue in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, cubefs or hue?

Choose cubefs if you want the larger community (5,660 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose hue if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.