head to head · open source
cubefs vs versitygw
cubefs has 5,664 GitHub stars, 714 forks, 265 open issues and last shipped yesterday. versitygw has 2,933 stars, 310 forks, 154 open issues and last shipped yesterday. cubefs leads on adoption by 93% (5,664 vs 2,933 stars). cubefs is written in Go under Apache-2.0; versitygw is written in Go under Apache-2.0. cubefs has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, versitygw 11%. versitygw was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (object-storage), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| cubefs | versitygw | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 5.7K | ★ 2.9K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Go | Go |
| Last push | 2026-09-22 | 2026-09-22 |
| Forks | ⑂ 714 | ⑂ 310 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick cubefs if
- You weight community size — 5.7K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick versitygw if
- You want the versitygw feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and versitygw fits your workflow better
About cubefs
CubeFS is an Apache 2.0, CNCF graduated cloud native distributed file and object storage system written in Go, built for teams that need POSIX, HDFS, S3, and REST access to a single storage layer across datacenters, private and hybrid clouds, and Kubernetes.
read the full cubefs overview →
About versitygw
VersityGW (the Versity S3 Gateway) is an Apache 2.0 licensed, Go based translation service that presents existing storage — a generic POSIX filesystem, Versity's open source ScoutFS, Azure Blob Storage, or another S3 server — through a standard S3 API, and it is aimed at teams that already run storage infrastructure and want S3 compatible access to it without migrating data into a separate object store.
read the full versitygw overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Warehousing & Processing projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Warehousing & Processing field.
Frequently asked questions
Is cubefs or versitygw more popular?
cubefs has 5,664 GitHub stars and versitygw has 2,933. cubefs has the larger community by that measure.
Are cubefs and versitygw free?
Both are open source. cubefs is licensed under Apache-2.0 and versitygw under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between cubefs and versitygw?
cubefs is written in Go and versitygw in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, cubefs or versitygw?
Choose cubefs if you want the larger community (5,664 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose versitygw if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.