head to head · open source

Harness vs xmake

Harness has 38,378 GitHub stars, 3,397 forks, 106 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. xmake has 12,220 stars, 954 forks, 255 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Harness leads on adoption by 214% (38,378 vs 12,220 stars). Harness is written in Go under Apache-2.0; xmake is written in Lua under Apache-2.0. Harness has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, xmake 8%. Harness was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Harness ★ 38K xmake ★ 12K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Harness xmake
GitHub stars ★ 38K ★ 12K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go Lua
Last push 2026-09-16 2026-09-16
Forks ⑂ 3.4K ⑂ 954
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Harness if

  • You weight community size — 38K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Harness profile →

pick xmake if

  • You want the xmake feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Lua
  • You evaluated both and xmake fits your workflow better

full xmake profile →

About Harness

Harness Open Source is an Apache 2.0, Go based developer platform that combines Git source control management, CI/CD pipelines, Gitspaces hosted development environments and artifact registries into one self hostable system for engineering teams that want end to end software delivery without stitching four separate products together.

read the full Harness overview →

About xmake

Xmake is a cross platform build utility and package manager, written in Lua and licensed under Apache 2.0, that takes a single xmake.lua project file and turns it into builds for desktop, mobile, BSD, Wasm and other targets — it is aimed at C, C++, Objective C and mixed toolchain developers who want Make/Ninja style building, CMake/Meson style project generation, and Vcpkg/Conan style dependency handling from one tool.

read the full xmake overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

vite vs harness vite vs webpack vite vs appwrite vite vs parcel webpack vs appwrite vite vs dokku vite vs turborepo vite vs nx opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More Build & Deployment projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Build & Deployment field.

Harness vs vite Harness vs webpack Harness vs Appwrite Harness vs parcel Harness vs Dokku Harness vs turborepo Harness vs nx Harness vs NocoBase Harness vs gradle Harness vs rspack Harness vs devbox Harness vs chalice

Frequently asked questions

Is Harness or xmake more popular?

Harness has 38,378 GitHub stars and xmake has 12,220. Harness has the larger community by that measure.

Are Harness and xmake free?

Both are open source. Harness is licensed under Apache-2.0 and xmake under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Harness and xmake?

Harness is written in Go and xmake in Lua. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Harness or xmake?

Choose Harness if you want the larger community (38,378 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose xmake if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.