head to head · open source

vite vs Harness

vite has 82,861 GitHub stars, 8,745 forks, 767 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Harness has 38,378 stars, 3,397 forks, 106 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. vite leads on adoption by 116% (82,861 vs 38,378 stars). vite is written in TypeScript under MIT; Harness is written in Go under Apache-2.0. vite has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, Harness 9%. vite was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

vite ★ 83K Harness ★ 38K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

vite Harness
GitHub stars ★ 83K ★ 38K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-16
Forks ⑂ 8.7K ⑂ 3.4K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick vite if

  • You weight community size — 83K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full vite profile →

pick Harness if

  • You want the Harness feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and Harness fits your workflow better

full Harness profile →

About vite

Vite is a build tool for modern web projects, distributed as a set of npm packages and licensed under MIT. It is written in TypeScript and lives in the JavaScript and frontend tooling ecosystem, where it sits alongside the bundlers and dev servers that compile application source into browser ready assets. The project describes itself as next generation frontend tooling and has been maintained for roughly six years, with the most recent push recorded in September 2026.

read the full vite overview →

About Harness

Harness Open Source is an Apache 2.0, Go based developer platform that combines Git source control management, CI/CD pipelines, Gitspaces hosted development environments and artifact registries into one self hostable system for engineering teams that want end to end software delivery without stitching four separate products together.

read the full Harness overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

vite vs webpack vite vs appwrite vite vs parcel vite vs dokku vite vs turborepo vite vs nx webpack vs appwrite opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode langflow vs supabase

More Build & Deployment projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Build & Deployment field.

vite vs webpack vite vs Appwrite vite vs parcel vite vs Dokku vite vs turborepo vite vs nx vite vs NocoBase vite vs gradle vite vs rspack vite vs devbox vite vs xmake vite vs chalice

Frequently asked questions

Is vite or Harness more popular?

vite has 82,861 GitHub stars and Harness has 38,378. vite has the larger community by that measure.

Are vite and Harness free?

Both are open source. vite is licensed under MIT and Harness under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between vite and Harness?

vite is written in TypeScript and Harness in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, vite or Harness?

Choose vite if you want the larger community (82,861 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Harness if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.