head to head · open source

Harness vs corrosion

Harness has 38,384 GitHub stars, 3,398 forks, 106 open issues and last shipped yesterday. corrosion has 1,498 stars, 150 forks, 71 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. Harness leads on adoption by 2,462% (38,384 vs 1,498 stars). Harness is written in Go under Apache-2.0; corrosion is written in CMake under MIT. Harness has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, corrosion 10%. Harness was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Harness ★ 38K corrosion ★ 1.5K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Harness corrosion
GitHub stars ★ 38K ★ 1.5K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Go CMake
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-05-16
Forks ⑂ 3.4K ⑂ 150
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Harness if

  • You weight community size — 38K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Harness profile →

pick corrosion if

  • You want the corrosion feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches CMake
  • You evaluated both and corrosion fits your workflow better

full corrosion profile →

About Harness

Harness Open Source is an Apache 2.0, Go based developer platform that combines Git source control management, CI/CD pipelines, Gitspaces hosted development environments and artifact registries into one self hostable system for engineering teams that want end to end software delivery without stitching four separate products together.

read the full Harness overview →

About corrosion

Corrosion Corrosion, formerly known as cmake cargo, is a tool for integrating Rust into an existing CMake project. Corrosion can automatically import executables, static libraries, and dynamic libraries from a workspace or package manifest ( Cargo.toml file). Features Automatic Import of Executable, Static, and Shared Libraries from Rust Crate Easy Installation of Rust Executables Trivially Link Rust Executables to C/C++ Libraries in Tree Multi Config Generator Support Simple Cross Compilation Sample Usage with FetchContent Using the CMake FetchContent module allows you to easily integrate corrosion into your bui…

read the full corrosion overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

vite vs harness vite vs webpack vite vs appwrite vite vs parcel webpack vs appwrite vite vs dokku vite vs turborepo vite vs nx opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More Build & Deployment projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Build & Deployment field.

Harness vs vite Harness vs webpack Harness vs Appwrite Harness vs parcel Harness vs Dokku Harness vs turborepo Harness vs nx Harness vs NocoBase Harness vs gradle Harness vs rspack Harness vs devbox Harness vs xmake

Frequently asked questions

Is Harness or corrosion more popular?

Harness has 38,384 GitHub stars and corrosion has 1,498. Harness has the larger community by that measure.

Are Harness and corrosion free?

Both are open source. Harness is licensed under Apache-2.0 and corrosion under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Harness and corrosion?

Harness is written in Go and corrosion in CMake. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Harness or corrosion?

Choose Harness if you want the larger community (38,384 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose corrosion if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.