head to head · open source

Harness vs cell

Harness has 38,378 GitHub stars, 3,397 forks, 106 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. cell has 746 stars, 66 forks, 23 open issues and last shipped 11 months ago. Harness leads on adoption by 5,045% (38,378 vs 746 stars). Harness is written in Go under Apache-2.0; cell is written in TypeScript under MIT. Harness has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, cell 9%. Harness was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Harness ★ 38K cell ★ 746 category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Harness cell
GitHub stars ★ 38K ★ 746
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Go TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-16 2025-11-05
Forks ⑂ 3.4K ⑂ 66
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Harness if

  • You weight community size — 38K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Harness profile →

pick cell if

  • You want the cell feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and cell fits your workflow better

full cell profile →

About Harness

Harness Open Source is an Apache 2.0, Go based developer platform that combines Git source control management, CI/CD pipelines, Gitspaces hosted development environments and artifact registries into one self hostable system for engineering teams that want end to end software delivery without stitching four separate products together.

read the full Harness overview →

About cell

Cell is TypeScript serverless first application framework. It lives in npm/TypeScript ecosystem. It targets serverless functions, microservices, BFF, full stack apps. It also connects Aliyun, AWS, Tencent Cloud. It is component based and platform independent.

read the full cell overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

vite vs harness vite vs webpack vite vs appwrite vite vs parcel webpack vs appwrite vite vs dokku vite vs turborepo vite vs nx opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More Build & Deployment projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Build & Deployment field.

Harness vs vite Harness vs webpack Harness vs Appwrite Harness vs parcel Harness vs Dokku Harness vs turborepo Harness vs nx Harness vs NocoBase Harness vs gradle Harness vs rspack Harness vs devbox Harness vs xmake

Frequently asked questions

Is Harness or cell more popular?

Harness has 38,378 GitHub stars and cell has 746. Harness has the larger community by that measure.

Are Harness and cell free?

Both are open source. Harness is licensed under Apache-2.0 and cell under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Harness and cell?

Harness is written in Go and cell in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Harness or cell?

Choose Harness if you want the larger community (38,378 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose cell if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.