head to head · open source

Harness vs captain

Harness has 38,384 GitHub stars, 3,398 forks, 106 open issues and last shipped yesterday. captain has 777 stars, 48 forks, 20 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. Harness leads on adoption by 4,840% (38,384 vs 777 stars). Harness is written in Go under Apache-2.0; captain is written in Go under MIT. Harness has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, captain 6%. Harness was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (ci, docker, git), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Harness ★ 38K captain ★ 777 category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Harness captain
GitHub stars ★ 38K ★ 777
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-12
Forks ⑂ 3.4K ⑂ 48
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Harness if

  • You weight community size — 38K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Harness profile →

pick captain if

  • You want the captain feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and captain fits your workflow better

full captain profile →

About Harness

Harness Open Source is an Apache 2.0, Go based developer platform that combines Git source control management, CI/CD pipelines, Gitspaces hosted development environments and artifact registries into one self hostable system for engineering teams that want end to end software delivery without stitching four separate products together.

read the full Harness overview →

About captain

Introduction Captain Convert your Git workflow to Docker containers ready for Continuous Delivery Define your workflow in the captain.yaml and use captain to your Continuous Delivery service to create containers for each commit, test them and push them to your registry only when tests passes. Use captain build to build your Dockerfile(s) of your repository. If your repository has local changes the containers will only be tagged as latest , otherwise the containers will be tagged as latest , COMMIT ID & BRANCH NAME . Now your Git commit tree is reproduced in your local docker repository. Use captain test to run yo…

read the full captain overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

vite vs harness vite vs webpack vite vs appwrite vite vs parcel webpack vs appwrite vite vs dokku vite vs turborepo vite vs nx opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More Build & Deployment projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Build & Deployment field.

Harness vs vite Harness vs webpack Harness vs Appwrite Harness vs parcel Harness vs Dokku Harness vs turborepo Harness vs nx Harness vs NocoBase Harness vs gradle Harness vs rspack Harness vs devbox Harness vs xmake

Frequently asked questions

Is Harness or captain more popular?

Harness has 38,384 GitHub stars and captain has 777. Harness has the larger community by that measure.

Are Harness and captain free?

Both are open source. Harness is licensed under Apache-2.0 and captain under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Harness and captain?

Harness is written in Go and captain in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Harness or captain?

Choose Harness if you want the larger community (38,384 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose captain if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.