head to head · open source
Harness vs build-server-protocol
Harness has 38,384 GitHub stars, 3,398 forks, 106 open issues and last shipped yesterday. build-server-protocol has 547 stars, 74 forks, 40 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. Harness leads on adoption by 6,917% (38,384 vs 547 stars). Harness is written in Go under Apache-2.0; build-server-protocol is written in Scala under Apache-2.0. Harness has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, build-server-protocol 14%. Harness was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Harness | build-server-protocol | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 38K | ★ 547 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Go | Scala |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-08-01 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.4K | ⑂ 74 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Harness if
- You weight community size — 38K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick build-server-protocol if
- You want the build-server-protocol feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Scala
- You evaluated both and build-server-protocol fits your workflow better
About Harness
Harness Open Source is an Apache 2.0, Go based developer platform that combines Git source control management, CI/CD pipelines, Gitspaces hosted development environments and artifact registries into one self hostable system for engineering teams that want end to end software delivery without stitching four separate products together.
read the full Harness overview →
About build-server-protocol
Build Server Protocol This project is an effort to improve the integration between language server/editors and build tools. This effort is led by the Scala Center together with the help of other tooling developers in the Scala ecosystem and beyond. Even though the protocol currently focuses on Scala developer tools, it's designed to be language agnostic. You can read the specification here. The specification text, docs and support libraries for some of the supported languages are automatically generated from the smithy model. Contribution If you'd like to contribute to the protocol, please check out our CONTRIBUT…
read the full build-server-protocol overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More Build & Deployment projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Build & Deployment field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Harness or build-server-protocol more popular?
Harness has 38,384 GitHub stars and build-server-protocol has 547. Harness has the larger community by that measure.
Are Harness and build-server-protocol free?
Both are open source. Harness is licensed under Apache-2.0 and build-server-protocol under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Harness and build-server-protocol?
Harness is written in Go and build-server-protocol in Scala. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Harness or build-server-protocol?
Choose Harness if you want the larger community (38,384 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose build-server-protocol if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.