head to head · open source
Harness vs bazel-remote
Harness has 38,384 GitHub stars, 3,398 forks, 106 open issues and last shipped yesterday. bazel-remote has 775 stars, 205 forks, 86 open issues and last shipped 27 days ago. Harness leads on adoption by 4,853% (38,384 vs 775 stars). Harness is written in Go under Apache-2.0; bazel-remote is written in Go under Apache-2.0. Harness has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, bazel-remote 26%. Harness was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Harness | bazel-remote | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 38K | ★ 775 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Go | Go |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-08-22 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.4K | ⑂ 205 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Harness if
- You weight community size — 38K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick bazel-remote if
- You want the bazel-remote feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and bazel-remote fits your workflow better
About Harness
Harness Open Source is an Apache 2.0, Go based developer platform that combines Git source control management, CI/CD pipelines, Gitspaces hosted development environments and artifact registries into one self hostable system for engineering teams that want end to end software delivery without stitching four separate products together.
read the full Harness overview →
About bazel-remote
bazel remote cache bazel remote is a HTTP/1.1 and gRPC server that is intended to be used as a remote build cache for REAPI clients like Bazel or as a component of a remote execution service. The cache contents are stored in a directory on disk with a maximum cache size, and bazel remote will automatically enforce this limit as needed, by deleting the least recently used files. S3, GCS and experimental Azure blob storage proxy backends are also supported. Note that while bazel remote is consumable as a go module, we provide no guarantees on the stability or backwards compatibility of the APIs. We do attempt to ke…
read the full bazel-remote overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More Build & Deployment projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Build & Deployment field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Harness or bazel-remote more popular?
Harness has 38,384 GitHub stars and bazel-remote has 775. Harness has the larger community by that measure.
Are Harness and bazel-remote free?
Both are open source. Harness is licensed under Apache-2.0 and bazel-remote under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Harness and bazel-remote?
Harness is written in Go and bazel-remote in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Harness or bazel-remote?
Choose Harness if you want the larger community (38,384 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose bazel-remote if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.