head to head · open source
Harden-Windows-Security vs TeamPass
Harden-Windows-Security has 4,821 GitHub stars, 346 forks, 5 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. TeamPass has 1,869 stars, 571 forks, 4 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Harden-Windows-Security leads on adoption by 158% (4,821 vs 1,869 stars). Harden-Windows-Security is written in C# under MIT; TeamPass is written in PHP under GPL-3.0. Harden-Windows-Security has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, TeamPass 31%. Harden-Windows-Security was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (audit, compliance, encryption), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Harden-Windows-Security | TeamPass | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 4.8K | ★ 1.9K |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Written in | C# | PHP |
| Last push | 2026-10-26 | 2026-10-26 |
| Forks | ⑂ 346 | ⑂ 571 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Harden-Windows-Security if
- You weight community size — 4.8K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches C#
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick TeamPass if
- You want the TeamPass feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches PHP
- You evaluated both and TeamPass fits your workflow better
About Harden-Windows-Security
Harden Windows Security A New Threat to Malware Harden Windows Safely, Securely, Only With Official Microsoft Methods How To Use Related Trust Support Security Recommendations Resources License Wiki Basic FAQs Roadmap Donation [!IMPORTANT]\ Here are Quick Access Points to Important Sections of this Repository Harden System Security App AppControl Manager App Application Control for Business Resources [!NOTE]\ This repository only uses the features that have already been implemented by Microsoft in Windows OS to fine tune it towards the highest security and locked down state, without relying on any 3rd party…
read the full Harden-Windows-Security overview →
About TeamPass
Teampass Self hosted password management your whole team can trust Folder level access control · authenticated AES 256 GCM encryption · compliance evidence Your secrets never leave your infrastructure. 🌐 teampass.net · 📖 Documentation · 💬 Discussions · 🐳 Docker Hub Contents About Who it's for Security Features Get started Documentation Languages Community Support Teampass License About Teampass is an open source credential vault you run yourself. No account to create, no company behind the curtain holding your data — just a PHP/MySQL application on your own server, with folder level access control, per user…
read the full TeamPass overview →
More in Business Software
Related comparisons
More Compliance & Risk Management projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Compliance & Risk Management field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Harden-Windows-Security or TeamPass more popular?
Harden-Windows-Security has 4,821 GitHub stars and TeamPass has 1,869. Harden-Windows-Security has the larger community by that measure.
Are Harden-Windows-Security and TeamPass free?
Both are open source. Harden-Windows-Security is licensed under MIT and TeamPass under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Harden-Windows-Security and TeamPass?
Harden-Windows-Security is written in C# and TeamPass in PHP. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Harden-Windows-Security or TeamPass?
Choose Harden-Windows-Security if you want the larger community (4,821 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose TeamPass if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.