head to head · open source

gspread vs PDF4QT

gspread has 7,507 GitHub stars, 978 forks, 73 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. PDF4QT has 1,477 stars, 145 forks, 32 open issues and last shipped yesterday. gspread leads on adoption by 408% (7,507 vs 1,477 stars). gspread is written in Python under MIT; PDF4QT is written in C++ under MIT. gspread has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, PDF4QT 10%. PDF4QT was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

gspread ★ 7.5K PDF4QT ★ 1.5K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

gspread PDF4QT
GitHub stars ★ 7.5K ★ 1.5K
License MIT MIT
Written in Python C++
Last push 2026-07-30 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 978 ⑂ 145
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick gspread if

  • You weight community size — 7.5K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full gspread profile →

pick PDF4QT if

  • You want the PDF4QT feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You evaluated both and PDF4QT fits your workflow better

full PDF4QT profile →

About gspread

gspread is a Python client library for the Google Sheets API v4 that lets Python code open, read, write, format, and share Google Sheets spreadsheets without hand writing HTTP requests against the Sheets REST endpoints.

read the full gspread overview →

About PDF4QT

PDF4QT is an MIT licensed, cross platform PDF toolkit for Windows and Linux that combines dedicated desktop applications — a viewer, editor, page manipulator, document diff tool and command line utility — with a C++/Qt PDF rendering engine built against the PDF Reference 2.0, and it is aimed at end users, developers and integrators who need PDF handling they can inspect, modify and redistribute without licence friction.

read the full PDF4QT overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

n8n vs cryptpad n8n vs onlyoffice-docs n8n vs libreoffice n8n vs ironcalc n8n vs collabora-online cryptpad vs onlyoffice-docs cryptpad vs libreoffice cryptpad vs ironcalc openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More Office Suites projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Office Suites field.

gspread vs CryptPad gspread vs ONLYOFFICE Docs gspread vs bento gspread vs LibreOffice gspread vs IronCalc gspread vs KillerPDF gspread vs Collabora Online gspread vs yft-design gspread vs ZenConverter

Frequently asked questions

Is gspread or PDF4QT more popular?

gspread has 7,507 GitHub stars and PDF4QT has 1,477. gspread has the larger community by that measure.

Are gspread and PDF4QT free?

Both are open source. gspread is licensed under MIT and PDF4QT under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between gspread and PDF4QT?

gspread is written in Python and PDF4QT in C++. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, gspread or PDF4QT?

Choose gspread if you want the larger community (7,507 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose PDF4QT if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.