head to head · open source

GrowthBook vs Cerbos

GrowthBook has 8,376 GitHub stars, 849 forks, 793 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Cerbos has 4,588 stars, 211 forks, 57 open issues and last shipped yesterday. GrowthBook leads on adoption by 83% (8,376 vs 4,588 stars). GrowthBook is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; Cerbos is written in Go under Apache-2.0. GrowthBook has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, Cerbos 5%. GrowthBook was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

GrowthBook ★ 8.4K Cerbos ★ 4.6K category Security & Privacy

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

GrowthBook Cerbos
GitHub stars ★ 8.4K ★ 4.6K
License Custom / other Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 849 ⑂ 211
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick GrowthBook if

  • You weight community size — 8.4K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full GrowthBook profile →

pick Cerbos if

  • You want the Cerbos feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and Cerbos fits your workflow better

full Cerbos profile →

About GrowthBook

GrowthBook is an open source platform for feature flags, A/B experimentation, and product analytics that product, data, and platform teams can either consume through a hosted cloud account or run entirely on their own infrastructure.

read the full GrowthBook overview →

About Cerbos

Cerbos is an open core authorization management platform written in Go under the Apache 2.0 license. It provides an authorization layer for applications, gateways, workloads, and AI agents, and it operates as a Policy Decision Point that evaluates access rules and returns decisions. The project lives in the Go and cloud native application security ecosystem, with Kubernetes, serverless, and edge deployment support reflected in its facts.

read the full Cerbos overview →

More in Security & Privacy

Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K JumpServer ★ 32K

Related comparisons

infisical vs growthbook infisical vs cerbos infisical vs unleash infisical vs capjs infisical vs flagsmith infisical vs flipt infisical vs opengrep infisical vs altcha puter vs mattermost puter vs signal puter vs ente mattermost vs signal mattermost vs ente signal vs ente puter vs element puter vs fluxer puter vs vault mattermost vs vault puter vs unkey mattermost vs unkey puter vs phase puter vs keyshade vault vs unkey mattermost vs phase

More Application Security projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Application Security field.

GrowthBook vs Infisical GrowthBook vs Unleash GrowthBook vs Cap GrowthBook vs Flagsmith GrowthBook vs Flipt GrowthBook vs Opengrep GrowthBook vs ALTCHA GrowthBook vs mCaptcha GrowthBook vs FeatBit GrowthBook vs Featurevisor GrowthBook vs Procaptcha GrowthBook vs Private Captcha

Frequently asked questions

Is GrowthBook or Cerbos more popular?

GrowthBook has 8,376 GitHub stars and Cerbos has 4,588. GrowthBook has the larger community by that measure.

Are GrowthBook and Cerbos free?

Both are open source. GrowthBook has no licence declared in this registry, and Cerbos is licensed under Apache-2.0. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between GrowthBook and Cerbos?

GrowthBook is written in TypeScript and Cerbos in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, GrowthBook or Cerbos?

Choose GrowthBook if you want the larger community (8,376 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose Cerbos if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.