head to head · open source

graphify vs open-science

graphify has 119,686 GitHub stars, 11,570 forks, 1,350 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. open-science has 4,696 stars, 287 forks, 40 open issues and last shipped today. graphify leads on adoption by 2,449% (119,686 vs 4,696 stars). graphify is written in Python under Apache-2.0; open-science is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. graphify has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, open-science 6%. open-science was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

graphify ★ 120K open-science ★ 4.7K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

graphify open-science
GitHub stars ★ 120K ★ 4.7K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Python TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-20
Forks ⑂ 12K ⑂ 287
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick graphify if

  • You weight community size — 120K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full graphify profile →

pick open-science if

  • You want the open-science feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and open-science fits your workflow better

full open-science profile →

About graphify

graphify is an Apache 2.0 Python CLI and /graphify skill that turns a whole project — code, docs, SQL schemas, configs, PDFs, images, and video — into a queryable knowledge graph, built for developers and AI agent users in Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, and Gemini CLI who want to query a codebase instead of grepping through files.

read the full graphify overview →

About open-science

AIPOCH Open Science is an open source, local first, model agnostic AI research workbench that lets scientists and researchers run computational and data intensive research with scientific AI agents inside a single desktop workspace on macOS, Windows, and Linux.

read the full open-science overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 390K Hermes Agent ★ 247K Ollama ★ 181K Dify ★ 157K Open WebUI ★ 153K langchain ★ 147K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs dify openclaw vs multica openclaw vs langgraph n8n vs dify dify vs langflow dify vs open-webui dify vs langchain dify vs ponytail openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs opencode openclaw vs n8n openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs odysseus openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm hermes-agent vs opencode openclaw vs ollama ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai open-webui vs gpt4all ollama vs faiss

More AI Development Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Development Platforms field.

graphify vs Dify graphify vs langchain graphify vs ponytail graphify vs generative-ai-for-beginners graphify vs claude-mem graphify vs ragflow graphify vs PaddleOCR graphify vs Agent-Reach graphify vs headroom graphify vs Mem0 graphify vs daily_stock_analysis graphify vs LiteLLM

Frequently asked questions

Is graphify or open-science more popular?

graphify has 119,686 GitHub stars and open-science has 4,696. graphify has the larger community by that measure.

Are graphify and open-science free?

Both are open source. graphify is licensed under Apache-2.0 and open-science under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between graphify and open-science?

graphify is written in Python and open-science in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, graphify or open-science?

Choose graphify if you want the larger community (119,686 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose open-science if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.