head to head · open source

graphify vs browser-harness

graphify has 118,991 GitHub stars, 11,505 forks, 1,350 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. browser-harness has 17,633 stars, 1,729 forks, 353 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. graphify leads on adoption by 575% (118,991 vs 17,633 stars). graphify is written in Python under Apache-2.0; browser-harness is written in Python under MIT. graphify has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, browser-harness 10%. graphify was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

graphify ★ 119K browser-harness ★ 18K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

graphify browser-harness
GitHub stars ★ 119K ★ 18K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Python Python
Last push 2026-09-16 2026-09-12
Forks ⑂ 12K ⑂ 1.7K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick graphify if

  • You weight community size — 119K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full graphify profile →

pick browser-harness if

  • You want the browser-harness feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and browser-harness fits your workflow better

full browser-harness profile →

About graphify

graphify is an Apache 2.0 Python CLI and /graphify skill that turns a whole project — code, docs, SQL schemas, configs, PDFs, images, and video — into a queryable knowledge graph, built for developers and AI agent users in Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, and Gemini CLI who want to query a codebase instead of grepping through files.

read the full graphify overview →

About browser-harness

Browser Harness is an open source, MIT licensed Python harness that connects an LLM directly to a real browser through one editable CDP websocket, built for developers and agent builders who want a coding agent to carry out browser work end to end.

read the full browser-harness overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 390K Hermes Agent ★ 246K Ollama ★ 181K Dify ★ 156K Open WebUI ★ 152K langchain ★ 147K

Related comparisons

dify vs graphify langchain vs graphify ponytail vs graphify dify vs langchain dify vs ponytail langchain vs ponytail dify vs claude-mem dify vs ragflow openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm openclaw vs cherry-studio openclaw vs nanobot openclaw vs jan openclaw vs librechat ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai llama-cpp vs vllm ollama vs pageindex ollama vs langfuse

More AI Development Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Development Platforms field.

graphify vs Dify graphify vs langchain graphify vs ponytail graphify vs generative-ai-for-beginners graphify vs claude-mem graphify vs ragflow graphify vs PaddleOCR graphify vs Agent-Reach graphify vs headroom graphify vs Mem0 graphify vs daily_stock_analysis graphify vs LiteLLM

Frequently asked questions

Is graphify or browser-harness more popular?

graphify has 118,991 GitHub stars and browser-harness has 17,633. graphify has the larger community by that measure.

Are graphify and browser-harness free?

Both are open source. graphify is licensed under Apache-2.0 and browser-harness under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between graphify and browser-harness?

graphify is written in Python and browser-harness in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, graphify or browser-harness?

Choose graphify if you want the larger community (118,991 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose browser-harness if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.