head to head · open source
graphify vs browser-harness
graphify has 141,064 GitHub stars, 13,483 forks, 1,350 open issues and last shipped yesterday. browser-harness has 18,821 stars, 1,858 forks, 353 open issues and last shipped yesterday. graphify leads on adoption by 650% (141,064 vs 18,821 stars). graphify is written in Python under Apache-2.0; browser-harness is written in Python under MIT. graphify has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, browser-harness 10%. browser-harness was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (claude-code, codex), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| graphify | browser-harness | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 141K | ★ 19K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 13K | ⑂ 1.9K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick graphify if
- You weight community size — 141K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick browser-harness if
- You want the browser-harness feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and browser-harness fits your workflow better
About graphify
Read this in other languages 🇺🇸 English 🇨🇳 简体中文 🇯🇵 日本語 🇰🇷 한국어 🇩🇪 Deutsch 🇫🇷 Français 🇪🇸 Español 🇮🇳 हिन्दी 🇧🇷 Português 🇷🇺 Русский 🇸🇦 العربية 🇮🇷 فارسی 🇮🇹 Italiano 🇵🇱 Polski 🇳🇱 Nederlands 🇹🇷 Türkçe 🇺🇦 Українська 🇻🇳 Tiếng Việt 🇮🇩 Bahasa Indonesia 🇸🇪 Svenska 🇬🇷 Ελληνικά 🇷🇴 Română 🇨🇿 Čeština 🇫🇮 Suomi 🇩🇰 Dansk 🇳🇴 Norsk 🇭🇺 Magyar 🇹🇭 ภาษาไทย 🇺🇿 Oʻzbekcha 🇹🇼 繁體中文 🇵🇭 Filipino 🇮🇱 עברית Early access to the graphify platform is open before the public v1 launch: app.graphify.com Type /graphify in your AI coding assistant and it maps your entire project (code…
read the full graphify overview →
About browser-harness
Browser Harness ♞ Connect an LLM directly to your real browser through one editable CDP websocket. The agent writes missing helpers as it works, so the harness improves with every task. Try browser harness in Browser Use Cloud or paste the setup prompt into your coding agent. You will never use the browser again. See it work Task: "Open my X profile, find my latest 20 video posts, and download them." Setup prompt Paste into Claude Code or Codex: The agent will open chrome://inspect/ remote debugging . On first setup, tick the checkbox so the agent can connect to your browser: How it works install.md connects the…
read the full browser-harness overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Development Platforms projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Development Platforms field.
Frequently asked questions
Is graphify or browser-harness more popular?
graphify has 141,064 GitHub stars and browser-harness has 18,821. graphify has the larger community by that measure.
Are graphify and browser-harness free?
Both are open source. graphify is licensed under Apache-2.0 and browser-harness under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between graphify and browser-harness?
graphify is written in Python and browser-harness in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, graphify or browser-harness?
Choose graphify if you want the larger community (141,064 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose browser-harness if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.