head to head · open source
goaccess vs Wraps
goaccess has 21,110 GitHub stars, 1,210 forks, 449 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. Wraps has 66 stars, 8 forks, 3 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. goaccess leads on adoption by 31,885% (21,110 vs 66 stars). goaccess is written in C under MIT; Wraps is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence. goaccess has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, Wraps 12%. Wraps was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (cli), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| goaccess | Wraps | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 21K | ★ 66 |
| License | MIT | Custom / other |
| Written in | C | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-10-28 | 2026-11-01 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.2K | ⑂ 8 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick goaccess if
- You weight community size — 21K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches C
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Wraps if
- You want the Wraps feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and Wraps fits your workflow better
About goaccess
GoAccess ======== What is it? GoAccess is an open source, real time web log analyzer and interactive viewer that runs in a terminal on nix systems or directly in your browser. Designed with system administrators, DevOps engineers, and security professionals in mind, it delivers fast, actionable HTTP statistics and visual server reports on the fly. GoAccess parses your web server logs in real time and presents the data directly in the terminal or via a live HTML dashboard, making it easy to monitor traffic, detect anomalies, and troubleshoot issues instantly. More info at: Features GoAccess parses the specified…
read the full goaccess overview →
About Wraps
Deploy email infrastructure to your AWS account in under 2 minutes. Quick Start Prerequisites: Node.js 22+, AWS credentials configured For AI Agents Using Claude Code, Cursor, or another AI assistant? Point it at: wraps.dev/llms full.txt — the complete Wraps documentation in one file (quickstarts, SDK reference, CLI reference, guides) wraps.dev/llms.txt — agent oriented index: when to use Wraps, quick command reference, links to everything Claude Code skills — installable from wraps.dev/.well known/skills/ MCP server — hosted at or run locally with npx y @wraps.dev/mcp for tools that send email, check setup…
read the full Wraps overview →
More in Business Software
Related comparisons
More Marketing & Customer Engagement projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Marketing & Customer Engagement field.
Frequently asked questions
Is goaccess or Wraps more popular?
goaccess has 21,110 GitHub stars and Wraps has 66. goaccess has the larger community by that measure.
Are goaccess and Wraps free?
Both are open source. goaccess is licensed under MIT, and Wraps has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between goaccess and Wraps?
goaccess is written in C and Wraps in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, goaccess or Wraps?
Choose goaccess if you want the larger community (21,110 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Wraps if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.