head to head · open source

goaccess vs Contentport

goaccess has 20,930 GitHub stars, 1,193 forks, 449 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Contentport has 765 stars, 107 forks, 19 open issues and last shipped 9 months ago. goaccess leads on adoption by 2,636% (20,930 vs 765 stars). goaccess is written in C under MIT; Contentport is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. goaccess has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, Contentport 14%. goaccess was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

goaccess ★ 21K Contentport ★ 765 category Business Software

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

goaccess Contentport
GitHub stars ★ 21K ★ 765
License MIT AGPL-3.0
Written in C TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-16 2025-12-12
Forks ⑂ 1.2K ⑂ 107
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick goaccess if

  • You weight community size — 21K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full goaccess profile →

pick Contentport if

  • You want the Contentport feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Contentport fits your workflow better

full Contentport profile →

About goaccess

GoAccess is an open source, real time web log analyzer and interactive viewer written in C and released under the MIT license. It parses web server logs and renders the results either in a terminal on nix systems or through a browser, updating every panel and metric every 200 milliseconds in the terminal output and every second in the HTML output. The project has been developed for roughly thirteen years and lives in the nix command line ecosystem, with a cluster of topics around analytics, Apache, Caddy, dashboards, and command line tooling.

read the full goaccess overview →

About Contentport

Contentport is an open source content platform for technical founders, positioned as a content engine for growing on Twitter at scale. It is written in TypeScript, licensed under AGPL 3.0, and listed under Business Software / Marketing & Customer Engagement. Its public roadmap describes scheduling, assistant prompts, thread creation, image handling, timezone behavior, and workspace isolation.

read the full Contentport overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 43K

Related comparisons

duckdb vs goaccess duckdb vs krayin duckdb vs listmonk duckdb vs excelize duckdb vs claude-seo duckdb vs billion-mail duckdb vs billionmail duckdb vs dbt plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip plane vs anki twenty vs anki odoo vs anki cal-com vs anki plane vs tutor twenty vs tutor odoo vs tutor cal-com vs tutor

More Marketing & Customer Engagement projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Marketing & Customer Engagement field.

goaccess vs duckdb goaccess vs Krayin goaccess vs Listmonk goaccess vs excelize goaccess vs claude-seo goaccess vs Billion Mail goaccess vs BillionMail goaccess vs dbt goaccess vs trino goaccess vs starrocks goaccess vs perspective goaccess vs Kutt

Frequently asked questions

Is goaccess or Contentport more popular?

goaccess has 20,930 GitHub stars and Contentport has 765. goaccess has the larger community by that measure.

Are goaccess and Contentport free?

Both are open source. goaccess is licensed under MIT and Contentport under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between goaccess and Contentport?

goaccess is written in C and Contentport in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, goaccess or Contentport?

Choose goaccess if you want the larger community (20,930 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Contentport if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.