head to head · open source
goaccess vs Contentport
goaccess has 21,110 GitHub stars, 1,210 forks, 449 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. Contentport has 772 stars, 108 forks, 19 open issues and last shipped 11 months ago. goaccess leads on adoption by 2,634% (21,110 vs 772 stars). goaccess is written in C under MIT; Contentport is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. goaccess has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, Contentport 14%. goaccess was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| goaccess | Contentport | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 21K | ★ 772 |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | C | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-10-28 | 2025-12-12 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.2K | ⑂ 108 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick goaccess if
- You weight community size — 21K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches C
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Contentport if
- You want the Contentport feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and Contentport fits your workflow better
About goaccess
GoAccess ======== What is it? GoAccess is an open source, real time web log analyzer and interactive viewer that runs in a terminal on nix systems or directly in your browser. Designed with system administrators, DevOps engineers, and security professionals in mind, it delivers fast, actionable HTTP statistics and visual server reports on the fly. GoAccess parses your web server logs in real time and presents the data directly in the terminal or via a live HTML dashboard, making it easy to monitor traffic, detect anomalies, and troubleshoot issues instantly. More info at: Features GoAccess parses the specified…
read the full goaccess overview →
About Contentport
contentport — public roadmap (last updated: 29th Nov 2025) Features in Pipeline Priority 1 Dark mode (requested by many users) Responsive layout (requested by many users) Community posting (requested by many users) Proactively create posts for users (requested by many users) Native code snippet editor (Raycast style) — personal wish (Jo) Accurate character limit handling for free Twitter users (necessary for UX) Auto plug (potentially useful feature) Timezone selection (requested by many users) Clarify whether scheduled times reflect: Local timezone UTC Or something else Display the active timezone clearly…
read the full Contentport overview →
More in Business Software
Related comparisons
More Marketing & Customer Engagement projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Marketing & Customer Engagement field.
Frequently asked questions
Is goaccess or Contentport more popular?
goaccess has 21,110 GitHub stars and Contentport has 772. goaccess has the larger community by that measure.
Are goaccess and Contentport free?
Both are open source. goaccess is licensed under MIT and Contentport under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between goaccess and Contentport?
goaccess is written in C and Contentport in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, goaccess or Contentport?
Choose goaccess if you want the larger community (21,110 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Contentport if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.