head to head · open source

giskard-oss vs akto

giskard-oss has 5,830 GitHub stars, 537 forks, 64 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. akto has 1,518 stars, 292 forks, 347 open issues and last shipped yesterday. giskard-oss leads on adoption by 284% (5,830 vs 1,518 stars). giskard-oss is written in Python under Apache-2.0; akto is written in Java under MIT. giskard-oss has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, akto 19%. akto was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (ai-security), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

giskard-oss ★ 5.8K akto ★ 1.5K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

giskard-oss akto
GitHub stars ★ 5.8K ★ 1.5K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Python Java
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 537 ⑂ 292
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick giskard-oss if

  • You weight community size — 5.8K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full giskard-oss profile →

pick akto if

  • You want the akto feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and akto fits your workflow better

full akto profile →

About giskard-oss

Giskard OSS is an open source Python library for evaluating, red teaming and testing LLM agents and RAG pipelines, built for developers, ML engineers and AI security teams that need reproducible checks on non deterministic systems.

read the full giskard-oss overview →

About akto

Akto is an open source Java project under the MIT license. Its metadata presents it as an AI security platform for teams that secure AI agents, MCPs, LLMs, Agent skills, and Gen AI apps, while its README describes it as an open source API security platform. It lives in the open source API security and AI security ecosystem.

read the full akto overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 390K Hermes Agent ★ 247K Ollama ★ 181K Dify ★ 157K Open WebUI ★ 153K langchain ★ 147K

Related comparisons

strix vs giskard-oss strix vs shannon strix vs skillspector strix vs ifixai strix vs codex-security strix vs garak strix vs ai-infra-guard strix vs agentic-bug-hunter openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs opencode openclaw vs n8n openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs comfyui openclaw vs odysseus openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm openclaw vs ollama ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs odysseus ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai open-webui vs gpt4all

More AI Security & Privacy projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Security & Privacy field.

giskard-oss vs strix giskard-oss vs shannon giskard-oss vs SkillSpector giskard-oss vs iFixAi giskard-oss vs codex-security giskard-oss vs garak giskard-oss vs AI-Infra-Guard giskard-oss vs Agentic-Bug-Hunter giskard-oss vs nono giskard-oss vs CyberStrike giskard-oss vs AiSOC giskard-oss vs pentest-ai-agents

Frequently asked questions

Is giskard-oss or akto more popular?

giskard-oss has 5,830 GitHub stars and akto has 1,518. giskard-oss has the larger community by that measure.

Are giskard-oss and akto free?

Both are open source. giskard-oss is licensed under Apache-2.0 and akto under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between giskard-oss and akto?

giskard-oss is written in Python and akto in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, giskard-oss or akto?

Choose giskard-oss if you want the larger community (5,830 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose akto if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.