head to head · open source
tianji vs GEOInflow
tianji has 3,119 GitHub stars, 200 forks, 139 open issues and last shipped yesterday. GEOInflow has 688 stars, 223 forks, 3 open issues and last shipped yesterday. tianji leads on adoption by 353% (3,119 vs 688 stars). tianji is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; GEOInflow is written in TypeScript under MIT. tianji has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, GEOInflow 32%. tianji was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (self-hosted), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| tianji | GEOInflow | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 3.1K | ★ 688 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-10-28 | 2026-10-28 |
| Forks | ⑂ 200 | ⑂ 223 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick tianji if
- You weight community size — 3.1K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick GEOInflow if
- You want the GEOInflow feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and GEOInflow fits your workflow better
About tianji
Tianji All in One Insight Hub Website analytics + Uptime Monitor + Server Status = Tianji All in one project! Motivation During our observations of the website. We often need to use multiple applications together. For example, we need analysis tools such as GA / umami to check pv/uv and the number of visits to each page, we need an uptime monitor to check the network quality and connectivity of the server, and we need to use prometheus to obtain the status reported by the server to check the quality of the server. In addition, if we develop an application that allows open source deployment, we often need a…
read the full tianji overview →
About GEOInflow
GEOInflow English 简体中文 Self hosted web and AI crawler analytics for Generative Engine Optimization (GEO). Jointly published by 猎看科技 · 北京日报社智源GEO Quick start · Deployment · AI crawler analytics · Architecture · Documentation · Contributing GEOInflow brings website visitors, AI search referrals, server crawl logs, and content inventories into a shared website context. It helps teams understand which AI crawlers visit their sites, which pages they request, which important pages have no observed crawl activity, where requests fail, and how AI search contributes visitors and conversions. The system includes browser…
read the full GEOInflow overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Web & Product Analytics projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Web & Product Analytics field.
Frequently asked questions
Is tianji or GEOInflow more popular?
tianji has 3,119 GitHub stars and GEOInflow has 688. tianji has the larger community by that measure.
Are tianji and GEOInflow free?
Both are open source. tianji is licensed under Apache-2.0 and GEOInflow under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between tianji and GEOInflow?
tianji is written in TypeScript and GEOInflow in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, tianji or GEOInflow?
Choose tianji if you want the larger community (3,119 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose GEOInflow if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.