head to head · open source
garak vs ARTEX
garak has 9,628 GitHub stars, 1,390 forks, 429 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. ARTEX has 1,485 stars, 712 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. garak leads on adoption by 548% (9,628 vs 1,485 stars). garak is written in Python under Apache-2.0; ARTEX is written in Go under AGPL-3.0. garak has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, ARTEX 48%. garak was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| garak | ARTEX | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 9.6K | ★ 1.5K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Python | Go |
| Last push | 2026-10-20 | 2026-10-19 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.4K | ⑂ 712 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick garak if
- You weight community size — 9.6K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick ARTEX if
- You want the ARTEX feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and ARTEX fits your workflow better
About garak
garak, LLM vulnerability scanner Generative AI Red teaming & Assessment Kit garak checks if an LLM can be made to fail in a way we don't want. garak probes for hallucination, data leakage, prompt injection, misinformation, toxicity generation, jailbreaks, and many other weaknesses. If you know nmap or msf / Metasploit Framework, garak does somewhat similar things to them, but for LLMs. garak focuses on ways of making an LLM or dialog system fail. It combines static, dynamic, and adaptive probes to explore this. garak 's a free tool. We love developing it and are always interested in adding functionality to…
read the full garak overview →
About ARTEX
ARTEX AI autonomous penetration testing system. Multi agent LLM, Go backend, Next.js frontend. AI 自主渗透测试系统（Go 后端 + Next.js 前端）。 ARTEX is a multi agent system for autonomous penetration testing in an isolated lab: a planner and workers share an asset graph and an exploration graph, with human in the loop approval and full traffic recording. It ships as one binary or a Docker Compose stack. 截图预览 审批记录详情 全局「审批记录」、任务内「拦截审批」及对话中的审批卡片均支持展开查看详情。展示结构参考 AegisHook 的审批详情组件，沿用 ARTEX 的组件和主题： 资产同步（ScopeSentry） 支持从 ScopeSentry 直接同步资产数据，免去重复收集： 在「 资产同步 」页填 ScopeSentry 的地址与 API Key，接入数据源； 按 项目 或 任务 维度选择要同步的目标与资产类型（域名 / 子域 / IP /…
read the full ARTEX overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Security & Privacy projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Security & Privacy field.
Frequently asked questions
Is garak or ARTEX more popular?
garak has 9,628 GitHub stars and ARTEX has 1,485. garak has the larger community by that measure.
Are garak and ARTEX free?
Both are open source. garak is licensed under Apache-2.0 and ARTEX under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between garak and ARTEX?
garak is written in Python and ARTEX in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, garak or ARTEX?
Choose garak if you want the larger community (9,628 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose ARTEX if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.