head to head · open source

fastapi vs xh

fastapi has 102,402 GitHub stars, 9,903 forks, 78 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. xh has 8,082 stars, 145 forks, 37 open issues and last shipped 13 days ago. fastapi leads on adoption by 1,167% (102,402 vs 8,082 stars). fastapi is written in Python under MIT; xh is written in Rust under MIT. fastapi has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, xh 2%. fastapi was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

fastapi ★ 102K xh ★ 8.1K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

fastapi xh
GitHub stars ★ 102K ★ 8.1K
License MIT MIT
Written in Python Rust
Last push 2026-09-14 2026-09-05
Forks ⑂ 9.9K ⑂ 145
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick fastapi if

  • You weight community size — 102K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full fastapi profile →

pick xh if

  • You want the xh feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and xh fits your workflow better

full xh profile →

About fastapi

FastAPI is an MIT licensed, high performance Python web framework for building APIs with standard Python type hints, aimed at Python developers and teams that need production ready HTTP services with automatic OpenAPI documentation.

read the full fastapi overview →

About xh

xh is a friendly and fast command line HTTP client written in Rust that reimplements as much of HTTPie's design as possible with a focus on improved performance, and it is built for developers and API testers who send HTTP requests from a terminal.

read the full xh overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K Neovim ★ 102K Zed ★ 90K

Related comparisons

fastapi vs hoppscotch fastapi vs bruno fastapi vs insomnia fastapi vs one-api fastapi vs openapi-specification fastapi vs openapi-generator fastapi vs redoc hoppscotch vs bruno opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More API Development & Testing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.

fastapi vs Hoppscotch fastapi vs Bruno fastapi vs Insomnia fastapi vs one-api fastapi vs OpenAPI-Specification fastapi vs openapi-generator fastapi vs redoc fastapi vs SafeLine fastapi vs Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF fastapi vs grpc-gateway fastapi vs Yaak fastapi vs hurl

Frequently asked questions

Is fastapi or xh more popular?

fastapi has 102,402 GitHub stars and xh has 8,082. fastapi has the larger community by that measure.

Are fastapi and xh free?

Both are open source. fastapi is licensed under MIT and xh under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between fastapi and xh?

fastapi is written in Python and xh in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, fastapi or xh?

Choose fastapi if you want the larger community (102,402 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose xh if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.