head to head · open source

fastapi vs WindsurfAPI

fastapi has 102,402 GitHub stars, 9,903 forks, 78 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. WindsurfAPI has 3,021 stars, 628 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped yesterday. fastapi leads on adoption by 3,290% (102,402 vs 3,021 stars). fastapi is written in Python under MIT; WindsurfAPI is written in JavaScript under MIT. fastapi has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, WindsurfAPI 21%. WindsurfAPI was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

fastapi ★ 102K WindsurfAPI ★ 3.0K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

fastapi WindsurfAPI
GitHub stars ★ 102K ★ 3.0K
License MIT MIT
Written in Python JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-14 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 9.9K ⑂ 628
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick fastapi if

  • You weight community size — 102K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full fastapi profile →

pick WindsurfAPI if

  • You want the WindsurfAPI feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and WindsurfAPI fits your workflow better

full WindsurfAPI profile →

About fastapi

FastAPI is an MIT licensed, high performance Python web framework for building APIs with standard Python type hints, aimed at Python developers and teams that need production ready HTTP services with automatic OpenAPI documentation.

read the full fastapi overview →

About WindsurfAPI

WindsurfAPI is a self hosted reverse proxy written in JavaScript and licensed under MIT. It exposes OpenAI, Anthropic, and Gemini compatible HTTP endpoints for 100+ Windsurf and Devin Desktop AI models. It has zero npm runtime dependencies. The project sits in the Developer Tools / API Development & Testing category and uses the Node.js ecosystem.

read the full WindsurfAPI overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K Neovim ★ 102K Zed ★ 90K

Related comparisons

fastapi vs hoppscotch fastapi vs bruno fastapi vs insomnia fastapi vs one-api fastapi vs openapi-specification fastapi vs openapi-generator fastapi vs redoc hoppscotch vs bruno opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More API Development & Testing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.

fastapi vs Hoppscotch fastapi vs Bruno fastapi vs Insomnia fastapi vs one-api fastapi vs OpenAPI-Specification fastapi vs openapi-generator fastapi vs redoc fastapi vs SafeLine fastapi vs Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF fastapi vs grpc-gateway fastapi vs Yaak fastapi vs hurl

Frequently asked questions

Is fastapi or WindsurfAPI more popular?

fastapi has 102,402 GitHub stars and WindsurfAPI has 3,021. fastapi has the larger community by that measure.

Are fastapi and WindsurfAPI free?

Both are open source. fastapi is licensed under MIT and WindsurfAPI under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between fastapi and WindsurfAPI?

fastapi is written in Python and WindsurfAPI in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, fastapi or WindsurfAPI?

Choose fastapi if you want the larger community (102,402 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose WindsurfAPI if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.