head to head · open source

fastapi vs rswag

fastapi has 102,409 GitHub stars, 9,906 forks, 78 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. rswag has 2,201 stars, 454 forks, 26 open issues and last shipped 26 days ago. fastapi leads on adoption by 4,553% (102,409 vs 2,201 stars). fastapi is written in Python under MIT; rswag is written in Ruby under MIT. fastapi has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, rswag 21%. fastapi was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (openapi), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

fastapi ★ 102K rswag ★ 2.2K category Developer Tools

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

fastapi rswag
GitHub stars ★ 102K ★ 2.2K
License MIT MIT
Written in Python Ruby
Last push 2026-09-14 2026-08-24
Forks ⑂ 9.9K ⑂ 454
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick fastapi if

  • You weight community size — 102K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full fastapi profile →

pick rswag if

  • You want the rswag feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Ruby
  • You evaluated both and rswag fits your workflow better

full rswag profile →

About fastapi

FastAPI is an MIT licensed, high performance Python web framework for building APIs with standard Python type hints, aimed at Python developers and teams that need production ready HTTP services with automatic OpenAPI documentation.

read the full fastapi overview →

About rswag

rswag is an MIT licensed Ruby gem that extends rspec rails request specs with a Swagger based DSL, so a Rails API team can describe and test its endpoints in one place and generate OpenAPI 3.0 files plus an embedded swagger ui from green tests.

read the full rswag overview →

More in Developer Tools

react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 208K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K

Related comparisons

fastapi vs hoppscotch fastapi vs bruno fastapi vs insomnia fastapi vs one-api fastapi vs openapi-specification fastapi vs openapi-generator fastapi vs redoc hoppscotch vs bruno openclaw vs langflow n8n vs langflow langflow vs langchain langflow vs supabase n8n vs tooljet n8n vs appsmith n8n vs budibase langflow vs pocketbase openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip

More API Development & Testing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.

fastapi vs Hoppscotch fastapi vs Bruno fastapi vs Insomnia fastapi vs one-api fastapi vs OpenAPI-Specification fastapi vs openapi-generator fastapi vs redoc fastapi vs SafeLine fastapi vs Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF fastapi vs grpc-gateway fastapi vs Yaak fastapi vs hurl

Frequently asked questions

Is fastapi or rswag more popular?

fastapi has 102,409 GitHub stars and rswag has 2,201. fastapi has the larger community by that measure.

Are fastapi and rswag free?

Both are open source. fastapi is licensed under MIT and rswag under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between fastapi and rswag?

fastapi is written in Python and rswag in Ruby. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, fastapi or rswag?

Choose fastapi if you want the larger community (102,409 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose rswag if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.