head to head · open source

fastapi vs metamcp

fastapi has 102,409 GitHub stars, 9,906 forks, 78 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. metamcp has 2,672 stars, 433 forks, 110 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. fastapi leads on adoption by 3,733% (102,409 vs 2,672 stars). fastapi is written in Python under MIT; metamcp is written in TypeScript under MIT. fastapi has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, metamcp 16%. fastapi was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

fastapi ★ 102K metamcp ★ 2.7K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

fastapi metamcp
GitHub stars ★ 102K ★ 2.7K
License MIT MIT
Written in Python TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-14 2026-06-22
Forks ⑂ 9.9K ⑂ 433
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick fastapi if

  • You weight community size — 102K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full fastapi profile →

pick metamcp if

  • You want the metamcp feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and metamcp fits your workflow better

full metamcp profile →

About fastapi

FastAPI is an MIT licensed, high performance Python web framework for building APIs with standard Python type hints, aimed at Python developers and teams that need production ready HTTP services with automatic OpenAPI documentation.

read the full fastapi overview →

About metamcp

🚀 MetaMCP (MCP Aggregator, Orchestrator, Middleware, Gateway in one docker) 📢 Latest Update: This ai dev branch will be the forward onging dev branch which contains ai agent changes. Please test before you build the image based on this branch. There has been many PRs thanks to the community but merging and reviewing them has been a growing effort too. I decided to include ai changes. At least so far the core functionality works. There is also a community maintained fork (ty a lot!): 📢 Update: From the author: apologize for some recent maintainence delay, but will at least keep merging PRs, more background [her…

read the full metamcp overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K Neovim ★ 102K Zed ★ 90K

Related comparisons

fastapi vs hoppscotch fastapi vs bruno fastapi vs insomnia fastapi vs one-api fastapi vs openapi-specification fastapi vs openapi-generator fastapi vs redoc hoppscotch vs bruno opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More API Development & Testing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.

fastapi vs Hoppscotch fastapi vs Bruno fastapi vs Insomnia fastapi vs one-api fastapi vs OpenAPI-Specification fastapi vs openapi-generator fastapi vs redoc fastapi vs SafeLine fastapi vs Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF fastapi vs grpc-gateway fastapi vs Yaak fastapi vs hurl

Frequently asked questions

Is fastapi or metamcp more popular?

fastapi has 102,409 GitHub stars and metamcp has 2,672. fastapi has the larger community by that measure.

Are fastapi and metamcp free?

Both are open source. fastapi is licensed under MIT and metamcp under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between fastapi and metamcp?

fastapi is written in Python and metamcp in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, fastapi or metamcp?

Choose fastapi if you want the larger community (102,409 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose metamcp if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.