head to head · open source

fastapi vs litestar

fastapi has 102,402 GitHub stars, 9,903 forks, 78 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. litestar has 8,467 stars, 646 forks, 343 open issues and last shipped yesterday. fastapi leads on adoption by 1,109% (102,402 vs 8,467 stars). fastapi is written in Python under MIT; litestar is written in Python under MIT. fastapi has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, litestar 8%. litestar was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 5 topic tags (api, asyncio, openapi, pydantic), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

fastapi ★ 102K litestar ★ 8.5K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

fastapi litestar
GitHub stars ★ 102K ★ 8.5K
License MIT MIT
Written in Python Python
Last push 2026-09-14 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 9.9K ⑂ 646
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick fastapi if

  • You weight community size — 102K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full fastapi profile →

pick litestar if

  • You want the litestar feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and litestar fits your workflow better

full litestar profile →

About fastapi

FastAPI is an MIT licensed, high performance Python web framework for building APIs with standard Python type hints, aimed at Python developers and teams that need production ready HTTP services with automatic OpenAPI documentation.

read the full fastapi overview →

About litestar

Litestar is an open source ASGI framework for Python, distributed under the MIT license and hosted in the litestar org GitHub organization. It describes itself as light, flexible and extensible, and it is built to scale. The project has been in development for five years, has accumulated 8,462 stars and 642 forks, and its most recent push was on 11 September 2026. Documentation lives at docs.litestar.dev, and the project publishes releases through PyPI.

read the full litestar overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K Neovim ★ 102K Zed ★ 90K

Related comparisons

fastapi vs hoppscotch fastapi vs bruno fastapi vs insomnia fastapi vs one-api fastapi vs openapi-specification fastapi vs openapi-generator fastapi vs redoc hoppscotch vs bruno opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More API Development & Testing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.

fastapi vs Hoppscotch fastapi vs Bruno fastapi vs Insomnia fastapi vs one-api fastapi vs OpenAPI-Specification fastapi vs openapi-generator fastapi vs redoc fastapi vs SafeLine fastapi vs Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF fastapi vs grpc-gateway fastapi vs Yaak fastapi vs hurl

Frequently asked questions

Is fastapi or litestar more popular?

fastapi has 102,402 GitHub stars and litestar has 8,467. fastapi has the larger community by that measure.

Are fastapi and litestar free?

Both are open source. fastapi is licensed under MIT and litestar under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between fastapi and litestar?

fastapi is written in Python and litestar in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, fastapi or litestar?

Choose fastapi if you want the larger community (102,402 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose litestar if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.