head to head · open source

fastapi vs greenmail

fastapi has 102,402 GitHub stars, 9,903 forks, 78 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. greenmail has 744 stars, 204 forks, 67 open issues and last shipped yesterday. fastapi leads on adoption by 13,664% (102,402 vs 744 stars). fastapi is written in Python under MIT; greenmail is written in Java under Apache-2.0. fastapi has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, greenmail 27%. greenmail was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

fastapi ★ 102K greenmail ★ 744 category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

fastapi greenmail
GitHub stars ★ 102K ★ 744
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in Python Java
Last push 2026-09-14 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 9.9K ⑂ 204
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick fastapi if

  • You weight community size — 102K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full fastapi profile →

pick greenmail if

  • You want the greenmail feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and greenmail fits your workflow better

full greenmail profile →

About fastapi

FastAPI is an MIT licensed, high performance Python web framework for building APIs with standard Python type hints, aimed at Python developers and teams that need production ready HTTP services with automatic OpenAPI documentation.

read the full fastapi overview →

About greenmail

GreenMail is a Java project that provides a virtual mail server for testing email based applications, services, and systems. It is Apache 2.0 licensed, published through Maven Central as com.icegreen:greenmail, and listed in Developer Tools / API Development & Testing.

read the full greenmail overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K Neovim ★ 102K Zed ★ 90K

Related comparisons

fastapi vs hoppscotch fastapi vs bruno fastapi vs insomnia fastapi vs one-api fastapi vs openapi-specification fastapi vs openapi-generator fastapi vs redoc hoppscotch vs bruno opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More API Development & Testing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.

fastapi vs Hoppscotch fastapi vs Bruno fastapi vs Insomnia fastapi vs one-api fastapi vs OpenAPI-Specification fastapi vs openapi-generator fastapi vs redoc fastapi vs SafeLine fastapi vs Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF fastapi vs grpc-gateway fastapi vs Yaak fastapi vs hurl

Frequently asked questions

Is fastapi or greenmail more popular?

fastapi has 102,402 GitHub stars and greenmail has 744. fastapi has the larger community by that measure.

Are fastapi and greenmail free?

Both are open source. fastapi is licensed under MIT and greenmail under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between fastapi and greenmail?

fastapi is written in Python and greenmail in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, fastapi or greenmail?

Choose fastapi if you want the larger community (102,402 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose greenmail if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.