head to head · open source

fastapi vs gnostic

fastapi has 102,409 GitHub stars, 9,906 forks, 78 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. gnostic has 2,302 stars, 279 forks, 119 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. fastapi leads on adoption by 4,349% (102,409 vs 2,302 stars). fastapi is written in Python under MIT; gnostic is written in Go under Apache-2.0. fastapi has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, gnostic 12%. fastapi was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (openapi, openapi3), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

fastapi ★ 102K gnostic ★ 2.3K category Developer Tools

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

fastapi gnostic
GitHub stars ★ 102K ★ 2.3K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in Python Go
Last push 2026-09-14 2026-08-10
Forks ⑂ 9.9K ⑂ 279
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick fastapi if

  • You weight community size — 102K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full fastapi profile →

pick gnostic if

  • You want the gnostic feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and gnostic fits your workflow better

full gnostic profile →

About fastapi

FastAPI is an MIT licensed, high performance Python web framework for building APIs with standard Python type hints, aimed at Python developers and teams that need production ready HTTP services with automatic OpenAPI documentation.

read the full fastapi overview →

About gnostic

gnostic is a Go command line tool from Google that compiles OpenAPI descriptions written in JSON or YAML into Protocol Buffer representations and back again, aimed at developers who need type safe, language neutral access to API descriptions and at tool authors who build code generators and other API tooling on top of a plugin interface.

read the full gnostic overview →

More in Developer Tools

react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 208K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K

Related comparisons

fastapi vs hoppscotch fastapi vs bruno fastapi vs insomnia fastapi vs one-api fastapi vs openapi-specification fastapi vs openapi-generator fastapi vs redoc hoppscotch vs bruno openclaw vs langflow n8n vs langflow langflow vs langchain langflow vs supabase n8n vs tooljet n8n vs appsmith n8n vs budibase langflow vs pocketbase openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip

More API Development & Testing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.

fastapi vs Hoppscotch fastapi vs Bruno fastapi vs Insomnia fastapi vs one-api fastapi vs OpenAPI-Specification fastapi vs openapi-generator fastapi vs redoc fastapi vs SafeLine fastapi vs Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF fastapi vs grpc-gateway fastapi vs Yaak fastapi vs hurl

Frequently asked questions

Is fastapi or gnostic more popular?

fastapi has 102,409 GitHub stars and gnostic has 2,302. fastapi has the larger community by that measure.

Are fastapi and gnostic free?

Both are open source. fastapi is licensed under MIT and gnostic under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between fastapi and gnostic?

fastapi is written in Python and gnostic in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, fastapi or gnostic?

Choose fastapi if you want the larger community (102,409 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose gnostic if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.