head to head · open source
fastapi vs cli-printing-press
fastapi has 104,566 GitHub stars, 10,179 forks, 78 open issues and last shipped yesterday. cli-printing-press has 4,903 stars, 533 forks, 65 open issues and last shipped yesterday. fastapi leads on adoption by 2,033% (104,566 vs 4,903 stars). fastapi is written in Python under MIT; cli-printing-press is written in Go under MIT. fastapi has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, cli-printing-press 11%. cli-printing-press was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (openapi), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| fastapi | cli-printing-press | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 105K | ★ 4.9K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Go |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 10K | ⑂ 533 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick fastapi if
- You weight community size — 105K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick cli-printing-press if
- You want the cli-printing-press feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and cli-printing-press fits your workflow better
About fastapi
FastAPI framework, high performance, easy to learn, fast to code, ready for production Documentation : Source Code : FastAPI is a modern, fast (high performance), web framework for building APIs with Python based on standard Python type hints. The key features are: Fast : Very high performance, on par with NodeJS and Go (thanks to Starlette and Pydantic). One of the fastest Python frameworks available. Fast to code : Increase the speed to develop features by about 200% to 300%. Fewer bugs : Reduce about 40% of human (developer) induced errors. Intuitive : Great editor support. Completion everywhere. Less time…
read the full fastapi overview →
About cli-printing-press
CLI Printing Press Nothing is more valuable than time and money. In a world of AI agents, that's speed and token spend. A well designed CLI is muscle memory for an agent: no hunting through docs, no wrong turns, no wasted tokens. We built the Printing Press to print the best CLIs in the world for agents. It reads the official API docs, studies every popular community CLI and MCP server, sniffs the web for the APIs nobody published (think Google Flights or Dominos), and applies the power user playbook Peter Steinberger proved with discrawl and gogcli local SQLite, compound commands, agent native flags. It fuses…
read the full cli-printing-press overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More API Development & Testing projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.
Frequently asked questions
Is fastapi or cli-printing-press more popular?
fastapi has 104,566 GitHub stars and cli-printing-press has 4,903. fastapi has the larger community by that measure.
Are fastapi and cli-printing-press free?
Both are open source. fastapi is licensed under MIT and cli-printing-press under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between fastapi and cli-printing-press?
fastapi is written in Python and cli-printing-press in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, fastapi or cli-printing-press?
Choose fastapi if you want the larger community (104,566 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose cli-printing-press if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.