head to head · open source

fastapi vs apitest

fastapi has 102,402 GitHub stars, 9,903 forks, 78 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. apitest has 846 stars, 58 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 15 days ago. fastapi leads on adoption by 12,004% (102,402 vs 846 stars). fastapi is written in Python under MIT; apitest is written in Go under MIT. fastapi has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, apitest 7%. fastapi was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

fastapi ★ 102K apitest ★ 846 category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

fastapi apitest
GitHub stars ★ 102K ★ 846
License MIT MIT
Written in Python Go
Last push 2026-09-14 2026-09-03
Forks ⑂ 9.9K ⑂ 58
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick fastapi if

  • You weight community size — 102K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full fastapi profile →

pick apitest if

  • You want the apitest feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and apitest fits your workflow better

full apitest profile →

About fastapi

FastAPI is an MIT licensed, high performance Python web framework for building APIs with standard Python type hints, aimed at Python developers and teams that need production ready HTTP services with automatic OpenAPI documentation.

read the full fastapi overview →

About apitest

apitest is a behavioural testing library for Go HTTP services, published under the MIT licence and maintained at github.com/steinfletcher/apitest. It lives in the Go ecosystem and has been in development for eight years, accumulating 846 stars and 58 forks, with an API the README describes as stable. Tests are written the way a client uses an API: a request is built, sent to a handler, and the response is asserted against expectations. The README states that in behavioural tests the internal structure of the application is not known by the tests; data is input to the system and the outputs must meet certain condi…

read the full apitest overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K Neovim ★ 102K Zed ★ 90K

Related comparisons

fastapi vs hoppscotch fastapi vs bruno fastapi vs insomnia fastapi vs one-api fastapi vs openapi-specification fastapi vs openapi-generator fastapi vs redoc hoppscotch vs bruno opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More API Development & Testing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.

fastapi vs Hoppscotch fastapi vs Bruno fastapi vs Insomnia fastapi vs one-api fastapi vs OpenAPI-Specification fastapi vs openapi-generator fastapi vs redoc fastapi vs SafeLine fastapi vs Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF fastapi vs grpc-gateway fastapi vs Yaak fastapi vs hurl

Frequently asked questions

Is fastapi or apitest more popular?

fastapi has 102,402 GitHub stars and apitest has 846. fastapi has the larger community by that measure.

Are fastapi and apitest free?

Both are open source. fastapi is licensed under MIT and apitest under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between fastapi and apitest?

fastapi is written in Python and apitest in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, fastapi or apitest?

Choose fastapi if you want the larger community (102,402 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose apitest if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.