head to head · open source

excelize vs Kutt

excelize has 20,918 GitHub stars, 1,949 forks, 131 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Kutt has 11,107 stars, 1,511 forks, 80 open issues and last shipped 15 days ago. excelize leads on adoption by 88% (20,918 vs 11,107 stars). excelize is written in Go under BSD-3-Clause; Kutt is written in JavaScript under MIT. excelize has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, Kutt 14%. excelize was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

excelize ★ 21K Kutt ★ 11K category Business Software

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

excelize Kutt
GitHub stars ★ 21K ★ 11K
License BSD-3-Clause MIT
Written in Go JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-16 2026-09-03
Forks ⑂ 1.9K ⑂ 1.5K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick excelize if

  • You weight community size — 21K stars and counting
  • You want the BSD-3-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full excelize profile →

pick Kutt if

  • You want the Kutt feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and Kutt fits your workflow better

full Kutt profile →

About excelize

Excelize is a pure Go library for reading and writing XLAM, XLSM, XLSX, XLTM and XLTX spreadsheets, built for Go developers who need to generate or parse Microsoft Excel 2007 and later workbooks directly from their own code.

read the full excelize overview →

About Kutt

Kutt is a free, MIT licensed, self hosted URL shortener written in JavaScript for individuals, teams, and organisations that want branded short links on their own infrastructure rather than a rented hosted service.

read the full Kutt overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 43K

Related comparisons

duckdb vs excelize duckdb vs krayin duckdb vs listmonk duckdb vs goaccess duckdb vs claude-seo duckdb vs billion-mail duckdb vs billionmail duckdb vs dbt plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip plane vs anki twenty vs anki odoo vs anki cal-com vs anki plane vs tutor twenty vs tutor odoo vs tutor cal-com vs tutor

More Marketing & Customer Engagement projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Marketing & Customer Engagement field.

excelize vs duckdb excelize vs Krayin excelize vs Listmonk excelize vs goaccess excelize vs claude-seo excelize vs Billion Mail excelize vs BillionMail excelize vs dbt excelize vs trino excelize vs starrocks excelize vs perspective excelize vs Mautic

Frequently asked questions

Is excelize or Kutt more popular?

excelize has 20,918 GitHub stars and Kutt has 11,107. excelize has the larger community by that measure.

Are excelize and Kutt free?

Both are open source. excelize is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and Kutt under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between excelize and Kutt?

excelize is written in Go and Kutt in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, excelize or Kutt?

Choose excelize if you want the larger community (20,918 stars) or its BSD-3-Clause licence terms. Choose Kutt if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.