head to head · open source
excelize vs growth-lab
excelize has 21,036 GitHub stars, 1,984 forks, 131 open issues and last shipped yesterday. growth-lab has 1,977 stars, 171 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. excelize leads on adoption by 964% (21,036 vs 1,977 stars). excelize is written in Go under BSD-3-Clause; growth-lab is written in Python under Apache-2.0. excelize has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, growth-lab 9%. excelize was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| excelize | growth-lab | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 21K | ★ 2.0K |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Go | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-09-28 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.0K | ⑂ 171 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick excelize if
- You weight community size — 21K stars and counting
- You want the BSD-3-Clause license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick growth-lab if
- You want the growth-lab feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and growth-lab fits your workflow better
About excelize
Excelize Introduction Excelize is a library written in pure Go providing a set of functions that allow you to write to and read from XLAM / XLSM / XLSX / XLTM / XLTX files. Supports reading and writing spreadsheet documents generated by Microsoft Excel™ 2007 and later. Supports complex components by high compatibility, and provided streaming API for generating or reading data from a worksheet with huge amounts of data. This library needs Go version 1.25.0 or later. The full docs can be seen using go's built in documentation tool, or online at go.dev and docs reference. Basic Usage Installation If your…
read the full excelize overview →
About growth-lab
🧪 Growth Lab 用自然语言运行产品运营和用户增长闭环：理解产品，发现真实需求，采取行动，再从结果中找到下一步。 官网 简体中文 · English · 繁體中文 · Français · Español · Русский · Português · Deutsch · 日本語 · 한국어 · Türkçe · Tiếng Việt · Polski 为什么做 Growth Lab 大多数 AI 增长工具只解决一个局部问题：有的生成文案，有的研究竞品，有的负责发布，有的展示数据。产品上下文在不同工具之间反复丢失，真正重要的决策仍散落在仪表盘、文档、Prompt 和人工交接中。 增长是一个持续学习的闭环： 现代 Coding Agent 已经能够读取代码仓库、搜索网络、操作工具、编辑文件、跨上下文推理，并在会话中与人协作。Growth Lab 以 Codex 和 Claude Code 作为应用 Runtime，将这些能力组织成端到端的增长工作流。 产品模型 Skill 教 Runtime 如何理解产品、开展研究、选择工具、形成策略、制作内容、分析反馈和决定下一步。Client 工具让 Runtime 能够使用浏览器、官方 API、数据导出、内容平台和素材生成等外部能力。文件跨会话保存产品上下文、研究资料、决策与结果。 AI 会话负责控制整个工作流程。 每个 Model 都是一个“观察—行动—复盘”闭环。每个…
read the full growth-lab overview →
More in Business Software
Related comparisons
More Marketing & Customer Engagement projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Marketing & Customer Engagement field.
Frequently asked questions
Is excelize or growth-lab more popular?
excelize has 21,036 GitHub stars and growth-lab has 1,977. excelize has the larger community by that measure.
Are excelize and growth-lab free?
Both are open source. excelize is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and growth-lab under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between excelize and growth-lab?
excelize is written in Go and growth-lab in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, excelize or growth-lab?
Choose excelize if you want the larger community (21,036 stars) or its BSD-3-Clause licence terms. Choose growth-lab if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.