head to head · open source

excelize vs django-DefectDojo

excelize has 21,036 GitHub stars, 1,984 forks, 131 open issues and last shipped yesterday. django-DefectDojo has 5,181 stars, 2,011 forks, 212 open issues and last shipped yesterday. excelize leads on adoption by 306% (21,036 vs 5,181 stars). excelize is written in Go under BSD-3-Clause; django-DefectDojo is written in Python under BSD-3-Clause. excelize has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, django-DefectDojo 39%. django-DefectDojo was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (analytics), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

excelize ★ 21K django-DefectDojo ★ 5.2K category Business Software

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

excelize django-DefectDojo
GitHub stars ★ 21K ★ 5.2K
License BSD-3-Clause BSD-3-Clause
Written in Go Python
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-11-02
Forks ⑂ 2.0K ⑂ 2.0K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick excelize if

  • You weight community size — 21K stars and counting
  • You want the BSD-3-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full excelize profile →

pick django-DefectDojo if

  • You want the django-DefectDojo feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the BSD-3-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and django-DefectDojo fits your workflow better

full django-DefectDojo profile →

About excelize

Excelize Introduction Excelize is a library written in pure Go providing a set of functions that allow you to write to and read from XLAM / XLSM / XLSX / XLTM / XLTX files. Supports reading and writing spreadsheet documents generated by Microsoft Excel™ 2007 and later. Supports complex components by high compatibility, and provided streaming API for generating or reading data from a worksheet with huge amounts of data. This library needs Go version 1.25.0 or later. The full docs can be seen using go's built in documentation tool, or online at go.dev and docs reference. Basic Usage Installation If your…

read the full excelize overview →

About django-DefectDojo

DefectDojo DefectDojo is a DevSecOps, ASPM (application security posture management), and vulnerability management tool. DefectDojo orchestrates end to end security testing, vulnerability tracking, deduplication, remediation, and reporting. Demo Pro Edition: pro.demo.defectdojo.com OWASP Community Edition: demo.defectdojo.org Either demo environment can be logged into with username admin and password 1Defectdojo@demo appsec . Please note that the demos are publicly accessible and reset every day. Do not put sensitive data in the demo. An easy way to test DefectDojo is to upload some sample scan reports. Quick…

read the full django-DefectDojo overview →

More in Business Software

Related comparisons

More Marketing & Customer Engagement projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Marketing & Customer Engagement field.

Frequently asked questions

Is excelize or django-DefectDojo more popular?

excelize has 21,036 GitHub stars and django-DefectDojo has 5,181. excelize has the larger community by that measure.

Are excelize and django-DefectDojo free?

Both are open source. excelize is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and django-DefectDojo under BSD-3-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between excelize and django-DefectDojo?

excelize is written in Go and django-DefectDojo in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, excelize or django-DefectDojo?

Choose excelize if you want the larger community (21,036 stars) or its BSD-3-Clause licence terms. Choose django-DefectDojo if its feature set, stack or BSD-3-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.